{"title":"Information Security, Risk \u0026 Business Continuity","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDocumentation toolkits for information security, IT governance, AI management, risk, compliance and business continuity. Aligned to ISO\/IEC 27001, ISO\/IEC 42001, ISO 22301, ISO 31000, ISO 37301 and related frameworks, these editable packages give security and risk teams the policies, procedures, registers and controls to build a certifiable ISMS, manage enterprise risk, and prove resilience. Ideal for organizations protecting data, meeting client security requirements, or preparing for certification audits.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","products":[{"product_id":"isms-iso27001-2022","title":"ISMS - ISO\/IEC 27001:2022","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented ISO\/IEC 27001:2022 information security management system, from the risk method through to a defensible Statement of Applicability.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO\/IEC 27001:2022 specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system, protecting the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information through a systematic, risk-based approach. It applies to any organisation regardless of size, sector or geography, and speaks to management, security professionals, auditors and anyone accountable for governing information risk. The clauses follow the Annex SL structure, from organisational context and leadership through planning, support, operation and performance evaluation to improvement, with Plan-Do-Check-Act embedded throughout.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRisk assessment and treatment sits at the centre, supported by a Statement of Applicability that justifies the selection or exclusion of each control. Annex A of the 2022 revision organises its controls into organisational, people, physical and technological themes, aligned to the implementation guidance in ISO\/IEC 27002:2022. The shared Annex SL basis makes integration with ISO\/IEC 20000-1, ISO 9001 and ISO\/IEC 42001 straightforward, and the system sits alongside ISO\/IEC 27005 for risk, ISO\/IEC 27017 for cloud services and ISO\/IEC 27701 for privacy.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContext, scope and interested parties: fixing ISMS boundaries and the issues behind them\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRisk assessment and treatment: criteria, risk ownership and acceptance of residual risk\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatement of Applicability: justifying every Annex A control applied or excluded\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAccess control and identity management: provisioning, privileged access and periodic review\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAsset management and classification: inventory, ownership, handling rules and retention\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInformation security incident management: detection, reporting, escalation and corrective action\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBusiness continuity, ICT readiness and operations security\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSupplier and third-party security: evaluation, contractual requirements and ongoing assurance\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten for the information security manager, IT lead or compliance officer handed a certification deadline, a client security questionnaire or a tender naming ISO\/IEC 27001. It supplies the manual, procedures, registers and audit tools an assessor expects to see, \u003cstrong\u003eready to be scoped to your organisation and populated with real evidence\u003c\/strong\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517061902676,"sku":"AGS-06-001","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISMS-ISO27001-2022.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-20000-1-2018-management-system","title":"ISO 20000-1-2018 Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eService level agreements, a service catalogue and the whole interlocking process portfolio an ISO\/IEC 20000-1 assessment works through.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO\/IEC 20000-1:2018 sets out the requirements for a service management system: how an organisation plans, designs, delivers, operates and improves services that meet agreed requirements and deliver value. It applies equally to internal IT functions, outsourced providers and commercial service organisations, and addresses service management leaders, process owners and auditors. Built on Annex SL and the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, it supplies the certifiable requirements against which good-practice frameworks such as ITIL are assessed, and aligns with ISO\/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe demanding part is the breadth of the process portfolio, and this documentation follows it process by process: service level management and reporting, capacity and availability, service continuity, budgeting and accounting for services, supplier management, incident and service request, problem, configuration, change, and release and deployment. Each is carried by a policy, a working procedure and the records the process produces, among them service level and operational level agreements, a service catalogue, capacity and continuity plans, change requests and service acceptance criteria.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eService level management and reporting: agreements, operational level agreements and performance against target\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eService catalogue and business relationship management: what is offered, and to whom\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIncident, service request and problem management: logging, prioritisation, escalation and root causes\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChange, release and deployment: change requests, acceptance criteria and controlled delivery\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConfiguration management: identification and control of configuration information across the estate\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCapacity and availability management: forecasting, planning worksheets and availability targets\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eService continuity: continuity plans, invocation and testing\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSupplier management, budgeting and accounting: contracts, governance and the cost of services\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAimed at managed service providers, outsourcing suppliers and internal IT departments whose next tender, contract renewal or certification audit turns on evidence that services are managed to a recognised benchmark. The end state is a system documented from policy down to record, waiting to be filled with live service data.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517061935444,"sku":"AGS-06-002","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-20000-1-2018-Management-System.png?v=1784574573"},{"product_id":"iso-38500-it-governance","title":"ISO 38500- IT Governance","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGovernance documentation written for the governing body rather than for the IT department.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO\/IEC 38500 sets out the guiding principles for the effective, efficient and acceptable governance of information technology. It is guidance rather than a requirements specification, directed at directors, owners, partners and executives and the advisers who support them, helping them meet their legal, regulatory and ethical obligations for the way technology is used. It suits public, private and not-for-profit bodies of any size, and draws a firm line between governance, which belongs to the governing body, and management, which is delegated.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe framework assembled here is organised around that cycle: the governing body evaluates current and future use of IT, directs the preparation of plans and policies, and monitors conformance and performance against them, with stakeholder engagement alongside. The principles of responsibility, strategy, acquisition, performance, conformance and human behaviour shape the decision records, registers and oversight checklists, which reach across investment approval, sourcing, delegation of authority, IT risk and ethical use. Not being intended for accredited certification, the material is built for board assurance, internal audit and self-assessment, complementing ISO\/IEC 20000-1, ISO\/IEC 27001 and ISO\/IEC 38507.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGoverning body accountability: decision rights and the boundary with management\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe evaluate, direct and monitor cycle: assessing IT use, setting direction, testing what returns\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIT strategy and alignment: connecting technology plans to organisational objectives\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eValue, investment and acquisition governance: business cases, thresholds and sourcing decisions\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIT risk governance and conformance: appetite, legal obligations and ethical use\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerformance oversight: governance indicators, board reporting and escalation of IT incidents\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuman behaviour and responsible stewardship: culture, stakeholder engagement and social responsibility\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor chairs, non-executive directors, company secretaries and CIOs who must show a regulator, auditor or shareholder that technology decisions are governed and not merely managed. They gain a framework the board can adopt, a cycle to run, and self-assessment checklists that expose where oversight is currently thin.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517062000980,"sku":"AGS-06-003","price":490.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-38500-IT-Governance.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-iec-38507-2022-governance-implications-of-the-use-of-ai","title":"ISO IEC 38507-2022-Governance implications of the use of AI","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAccountability for artificial intelligence stays with the board, including for the AI an organisation buys rather than builds.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO\/IEC 38507:2022 guides members of a governing body through the governance implications of using artificial intelligence. Its scope reaches organisations of every type and size that use AI, are considering it, or are affected by it, whether they build systems or acquire them, and it addresses directors, owners and executive leaders with the advisers who support them. Consistent with ISO\/IEC 38500, it applies the evaluate, direct and monitor model so that AI adoption aligns with organisational objectives, obligations and stakeholder expectations.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIts substance is the questions a board must be able to answer: where AI-related risk originates, how the data used to train and operate systems was obtained and authorised, what transparency and explainability are owed to interested parties, and how the ethical, legal and societal implications of automated and algorithmic decision-making are weighed. The standard is explicit that operational responsibility may be delegated while accountability for acceptable use may not. As guidance rather than a certifiable specification, it complements ISO\/IEC 42001 and draws on ISO\/IEC 22989 for terminology and ISO\/IEC 23894 for AI risk.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAI use-case authorisation: where AI may be deployed, on what conditions, approved by whom\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGovernance of AI decision-making: limits on automated decisions and how they are reviewed\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGovernance of data use for AI: provenance, permitted purposes and the record of authorisation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTransparency and explainability: what is disclosed about AI use, to whom and when\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAI risk governance: appetite, sources, controls and escalation when an incident occurs\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAccountability and delegation: duties split between board, executives and delivery teams\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompliance obligations, culture and human behaviour: legal, ethical and societal expectations\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuited to directors, risk committee members, general counsel and heads of technology at the moment AI reaches the corporate risk register or a regulator's questions. They finish with a governance framework, an authorised inventory of AI use cases and a documented trail of the decisions taken about each.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517062164820,"sku":"AGS-06-004","price":490.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-IEC-38507-2022-Governance-implications-of-the-use-of-AI.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-iec-42001-2023-ai-management-system","title":"ISO IEC 42001-2023 -AI Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe certifiable side of responsible AI: risk treatment, system impact assessment and a justified set of Annex A controls.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO\/IEC 42001:2023 is the first international standard specifying requirements for an artificial intelligence management system, a way to develop, provide and use AI responsibly while holding innovation, governance and trustworthiness in balance. It applies to any organisation of any size or sector working with AI-based products or services, and speaks to leadership, AI and data practitioners, risk and compliance functions and auditors. Its clauses follow Annex SL, with the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle driving continual improvement.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhat separates it from a general management system is its AI-specific machinery: risk assessment and treatment tuned to AI, joined by an AI system impact assessment weighing effects on individuals, groups and society rather than the organisation alone. Reference controls in the annexes span policies for AI, internal organisation, resources, impact assessment, the AI system life cycle, data management, information for interested parties and third-party relationships, selected or set aside through a Statement of Applicability. It aligns with ISO\/IEC 22989, ISO\/IEC 23894 and ISO\/IEC 38507, integrates with ISO\/IEC 27001, ISO\/IEC 27701 and ISO 9001, and supports emerging regulatory expectations such as the EU AI Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContext, scope and AI policy: which systems and roles the management system takes in\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAI risk and opportunity management: criteria, risk owners and treatment plans\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAI system impact assessment: documented effects on individuals, groups and society\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatement of Applicability: justifying each Annex A control applied or excluded\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAI system life cycle and operational control: design, deployment readiness and change\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData management for AI: provenance, quality and control of training data\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThird-party, supplier and customer management: evaluation and allocation of responsibility\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInternal audit, management review, AI incidents and corrective action\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBuilt for organisations already deploying AI and now facing procurement questionnaires, regulatory scrutiny or a board asking who approved the model, usually the AI or data lead working with risk and compliance. Once populated, it gives an auditor a system to examine and the business a documented answer on how its AI is run.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517062230356,"sku":"AGS-06-005","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-IEC-42001-2023-AI-Management-System.png?v=1784574573"},{"product_id":"iso-27017-management-system","title":"ISO-27017 Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCloud security stops being a shared assumption and becomes a shared responsibility that is written down, allocated and testable.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO\/IEC 27017 is a code of practice giving guidelines for information security controls that apply to the provision and use of cloud services. It builds on ISO\/IEC 27002, adding cloud-specific guidance to many of its controls and introducing further controls unique to the cloud. It addresses providers and customers alike, with the architects, auditors and procurement teams who must settle where one party's obligations end and the other's begin. It is not a standalone certifiable system: it is used alongside an ISO\/IEC 27001 ISMS, and conformity is typically assessed as an extension of that certification, its scope explicitly naming the cloud controls.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe subject matter is practical: dividing security responsibilities between provider and customer, removal and return of assets on contract termination, segregation within virtualised environments, the operational security of cloud administrators, monitoring of cloud services, and alignment of the virtual network environment with the physical one. The documentation carries the ISMS spine those controls attach to, plus cloud security and acceptable use policies, shared responsibility guidance and a cloud asset register. ISO\/IEC 27018 commonly accompanies it where public clouds hold personally identifiable information.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShared responsibility: allocating each control and naming who evidences it\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVirtualisation and segregation: hardening virtual machines, separating tenant environments\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCloud administrator operational security: privileged operations, monitoring and log review\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCloud asset identification and classification: bringing cloud instances into the register\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContract termination: return of assets, media disposal and withdrawal of access\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCloud vendor assessment and acceptable use: supplier evaluation and rules for users\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRisk assessment, incident investigation and continuity testing in the underlying ISMS\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePersonnel security across the joiner, mover and leaver cycle, with role-based training\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntended for cloud providers answering customer due diligence, and for organisations whose critical workloads now sit on third-party platforms while their ISO\/IEC 27001 scope has yet to catch up. The trigger is usually a client audit or a tender clause; the outcome is a control set with every cloud control assigned to a named party.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517062394196,"sku":"AGS-06-006","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-27017-Management-System.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-iec-19770-1-2017-amd-1-2024-it-asset-management-system","title":"ISO-IEC 19770-1-2017 + Amd.1-2024-IT Asset Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEvery device and licence accounted for from acquisition to responsible disposal, with a documented position to answer a publisher audit.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO\/IEC 19770-1:2017 with Amendment 1:2024 specifies the requirements for an IT asset management system, a framework for governing software, hardware and related technology assets across their life cycle. Its purpose is to demonstrate responsible management of those assets, hold to licensing and contractual obligations, optimise cost and reduce risk, and it is worked by IT asset managers, procurement and finance, security and compliance teams, auditors and the executives accountable for technology spend. The Annex SL structure and the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle make integration with ISO\/IEC 27001 and ISO\/IEC 20000-1 straightforward, while the wider ISO\/IEC 19770 family adds identification specifications such as software identification tags.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmendment 1:2024 refreshes and clarifies requirements to keep the standard aligned with contemporary practice, which shows here in responsible disposal guidance and a climate action readiness checklist beside the conventional asset controls. The material runs from a strategic asset management plan and inventory register through licence tracking, physical verification, change and disposal, out to internal asset audit, control of nonconforming assets and preparation for a certification audit.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStrategic IT asset management planning: objectives, the asset plan and continual improvement\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLicensing, legal and contractual compliance: entitlements tracked against what is deployed\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAsset life cycle control: onboarding, deployment, change, movement and retirement\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInventory and physical verification: identification, ownership and reconciliation against reality\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResponsible disposal and climate action: recycling, media handling and Amendment 1:2024 readiness\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSupplier and outsourcing management: assets held or operated by third parties\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePhysical, environmental and organisational security of IT assets, with continuity of asset-dependent services\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInternal asset audit, nonconforming assets and management review\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the IT asset or software asset manager, typically prompted by a publisher licence review, a finance request to explain technology spend, or a decision to certify. It leaves them with a working register, a licence tracker, a disposal route that stands up to scrutiny and the evidence a certification body asks to examine.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517062426964,"sku":"AGS-06-007","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-IEC-19770-1-2017-Amd-1-2024-IT-Asset-Management-System.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"pims-iso27701-2025","title":"PIMS ISO27701 2025","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eExtend an ISO 27001 system with the privacy controls, records and evidence a PIMS audit expects.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO\/IEC 27701 sets the requirements for a Privacy Information Management System as an extension to ISO\/IEC 27001 and ISO\/IEC 27002, not as a standalone standard. It addresses the risks created by processing personally identifiable information and separates the duties of the PII controller from those of the PII processor. Its additional controls supplement Annex A on consent, purpose limitation, PII principal rights, records of processing, privacy by design and by default, and the sharing, transfer and disclosure of PII, mapped to privacy frameworks and regulations such as the GDPR.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis material turns those requirements into a working system: a PIMS manual and scheme fix scope, context and governance, the Statement of Applicability justifies each control, and the RoPA register, privacy risk register, retention schedule and supplier register hold the evidence an auditor asks to see. Procedures run from data protection impact assessment and consent management through PII principal requests, breach handling and cross-border transfers, with guidance on legal bases for processing. Inheriting the Annex SL structure through ISO\/IEC 27001, it sits alongside an existing ISMS and complements ISO\/IEC 29100 and ISO\/IEC 27018.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScope, context and interested parties — the PIMS boundary and where it meets the ISMS\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecords of processing activities — RoPA for controller and processor roles, purposes and legal bases\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePrivacy risk and impact assessment — DPIA screening, risk treatment and the Statement of Applicability\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConsent and PII principal rights — capture and withdrawal of consent, requests logged to response\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRetention, disposal and cross-border transfer — schedules, disposal evidence and transfer safeguards\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSupplier, processor and sub-processor control — due diligence, assessment and continuing oversight\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePrivacy incident and breach management — detection, reporting, notification and corrective action\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAssurance and competence — internal audit, management review, privacy by design reviews and training\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten for data protection officers, privacy leads and ISMS managers whose organisation holds or is pursuing ISO\/IEC 27001 and now faces a customer contract, a regulator or a certification body asking how PII is governed. It suits privacy teams, internal auditors and consultants preparing a PIMS extension audit, who need scope, controls and records consistent before an accredited body reviews them.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517062492500,"sku":"AGS-06-008","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/PIMS-ISO27701-2025.png?v=1784574573"},{"product_id":"iso-22301-2019-business-continuity-management-system","title":"ISO 22301-2019-Business Continuity Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePlan for the disruption before it arrives, and show afterwards that the plan was exercised.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 22301:2019 specifies requirements for a business continuity management system (BCMS) — the arrangements that let an organisation prepare for, respond to and recover from disruptive incidents while critical activities keep running at predefined acceptable levels. Natural disasters, cyber-attacks, supply chain failure, pandemics and technology outages all sit inside that scope. The set follows the standard's own sequence under the ISO harmonised high-level structure (Annex SL) and the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe operational weight sits in the business impact analysis and the continuity risk assessment, which establish what is critical, what it depends on, and the recovery time objective, recovery point objective and maximum tolerable period of disruption that govern the response. Strategy selection follows, then continuity plans, an incident response structure and warning arrangements; exercising, internal audit and management review close the cycle. Sharing Annex SL, ISO 22301 integrates with ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 31000, with implementation guidance in ISO 22313. Gap analysis and audit material are included for organisations working towards accredited third-party certification.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBusiness impact analysis — critical activities, dependencies, RTO, RPO and maximum tolerable period of disruption\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContinuity risk assessment — threat scenarios, single points of failure and proportionate treatment\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContinuity strategy — people, premises, technology and supplier options against minimum acceptable service levels\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePlans and response structure — activation criteria, incident roles, escalation and stand-down\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWarning and communication — alerting staff, customers, suppliers and regulators during an incident\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExercise and testing — desktop, walkthrough and live exercises, with reporting and follow-up\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerformance evaluation — monitoring, internal audit and management review of the defined scope\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBusiness continuity and risk managers, operations directors and quality leads in organisations of any size, public, private or not-for-profit, who have been asked for a management system rather than a folder of recovery notes. The trigger is usually a certification decision, a customer contract, a regulator's expectations, or an incident that exposed how little was written down. You end with a defined scope, a completed impact analysis, exercised plans and an evidence trail an auditor can follow.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517064655188,"sku":"AGS-08-001","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-22301-2019-Business-Continuity-Management-System.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-22316-2017-security-and-resilience","title":"ISO 22316-2017: Security and resilience","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eResilience is an outcome rather than a department, and ISO 22316 names the attributes that produce it.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 22316:2017 provides principles, attributes and guidance for organisational resilience: the ability to absorb and adapt in a changing environment so that an organisation continues to deliver its objectives, survive and prosper. It is guidance rather than a requirements standard and is not intended for certification: a framework of good practice that organisations of any type and size adopt to anticipate, respond to and learn from incremental change as well as sudden disruption.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResilience here is emergent and strategic, produced by coordinating disciplines that usually report separately rather than by installing one management system. The attributes the standard identifies include a shared vision and clarity of purpose, understanding of and influence over internal and external context, leadership that is effective and free to act, a culture supporting learning and information sharing, the availability and effective use of information, knowledge and resources, coordinated management disciplines, and the capacity to improve and adapt. This set makes those attributes assessable through self-assessment and maturity scoring, placing resilience above ISO 22301 continuity, ISO 31000 risk, ISO 27001 information security and ISO 37301 compliance rather than beside them.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContext and interested parties — the internal and external factors shaping resilience\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLeadership, governance and culture — decision rights, behaviours, learning and information sharing\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInformation and knowledge — what the organisation knows, available where decisions are taken\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResource availability — the people, assets and capabilities objectives depend on\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCoordination of management disciplines — aligning continuity, risk, security and compliance\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAttribute evaluation and maturity — self-assessment, scoring and evidence of improvement\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChange and continual improvement — adapting as strategy, structure or environment shifts\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBoards, executive teams, governance functions and the practitioners who advise them, usually where certified programmes already exist but do not talk to each other. The trigger is a board question about how resilient the organisation actually is, a restructure, or a disruption that four functions handled four different ways. Applied as guidance rather than audited conformity, it leaves an agreed definition of resilience, a scored baseline and a named owner for each attribute.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517064720724,"sku":"AGS-08-002","price":490.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-22316-2017-Security-and-resilience.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-31000-2018-iec-31010-risk-management-system","title":"ISO 31000-2018 · IEC 31010 -Risk Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA risk register earns its place only when the method behind each score can be explained.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 31000:2018 and IEC 31010 are the core international guidance on managing risk. ISO 31000 sets out principles, a framework and a process for any organisation, any sector and any type of risk, whether its consequences are negative or positive. It is guidance rather than a certifiable requirements standard, written for boards, executives and anyone deciding under uncertainty, and it holds that risk management should be integrated, structured, customised, inclusive and dynamic, based on the best available information, and should create and protect value.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe framework covers leadership and commitment, integration, design, implementation, evaluation and improvement; the process runs from communication and consultation and the establishment of scope, context and criteria, through risk assessment and treatment, to monitoring, review, recording and reporting. IEC 31010 expands the assessment step, cataloguing techniques and setting out where each applies and where it falls short: brainstorming, structured interviews, checklists, failure modes and effects analysis, hazard and operability studies, fault and event tree analysis, bow-tie analysis and Monte Carlo simulation among others. Vocabulary follows ISO Guide 73, so the register lines up with the risk-based thinking already embedded in ISO 22301, ISO 27001 and ISO 37301.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScope, context and criteria — what is assessed, and the thresholds by which risk is judged\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentification and analysis — choosing an IEC 31010 technique that suits the decision in hand\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvaluation and scoring — consistent likelihood and consequence criteria across departments\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRisk treatment — selecting, justifying and tracking controls, with residual risk recorded\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCommunication and consultation — involving stakeholders throughout, not at sign-off\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMonitoring, review and reporting — keeping the register current and risk in front of management\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFramework maturity — leadership commitment, integration into decisions, review of the framework\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRisk managers, internal auditors and the executives who own the register, most often where every department scores risk its own way and the results cannot be compared. Purchase follows a board request for one consistent view of risk, or an auditor asking how a rating was arrived at. Because both documents are guidance, the outcome is not a certificate but a defensible framework, a live register and treatment plans whose reasoning survives challenge.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517064884564,"sku":"AGS-08-003","price":490.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-31000-2018-IEC-31010-Risk-Management-System.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-35001-2019-biorisk-management-system","title":"ISO 35001-2019-Biorisk Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBiosafety and biosecurity held in one framework, from the biorisk assessment through to decontamination and waste.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 35001:2019 specifies requirements and gives guidance for a biorisk management system in laboratories and other organisations that work with biological agents and toxins. It holds two disciplines together: biosafety, the containment principles and practices that prevent unintentional exposure or accidental release, and biosecurity, the protection, control and accountability measures that prevent loss, theft, misuse or intentional release. It applies wherever biological agents are handled, stored, transported or disposed of — clinical, research, academic, veterinary, agricultural, industrial and public health laboratories, and production and diagnostic facilities.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe system follows the ISO harmonised high-level structure — context, leadership and worker engagement, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation and improvement — under Plan-Do-Check-Act. Its operational core is the biorisk assessment and the hierarchy of controls that follows from it: elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative measures and personal protective equipment. Around it sit competence and training, inventory and accountability for biological materials, personnel reliability, decontamination and emergency planning. The content draws on the World Health Organization Laboratory Biosafety Manual and aligns with ISO 9001, ISO 45001 and ISO 31000. ISO 35001 carries auditable requirements, and independent assessment can be sought where a regulator, funder or customer expects it.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBiorisk assessment — agents, procedures and exposure routes identified, evaluated and treated\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHierarchy of controls — elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative measures and PPE\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContainment and biosafety levels — facility practice, inspections and daily laboratory checks\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBiosecurity and personnel reliability — access approval, vetting and sensitive information\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInventory and accountability — receipt, storage, transfer and disposal of biological materials\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDecontamination and waste — methods, waste streams and verification of effectiveness\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEmergency preparedness — contingency planning, incidents and transport emergency response\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEquipment and physical security — maintenance, calibration, validation and security checks\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBiosafety officers, biorisk managers, laboratory directors and the quality staff supporting them in facilities handling infectious material. The purchase is usually prompted by a regulator, funder, accreditation body or institutional biosafety committee asking for a documented biorisk management system, or by a new or upgraded containment facility coming into use. You end with a stated biorisk policy, procedures assessed and controlled, staff trained and vetted, and inspections, drills and inventories recorded where an assessor will look.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517064917332,"sku":"AGS-08-004","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-35001-2019-Biorisk-Management-System.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-28000-2022-management-system","title":"ISO 28000 2022 Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIf your goods change hands, your security controls have to change hands with them.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 28000:2022 specifies requirements for a security management system, including the aspects relevant to security of the supply chain. It covers the protection of people, goods, infrastructure, information and operations against theft, smuggling, tampering, terrorism, sabotage and other malicious acts, with measures proportionate to assessed risk rather than uniform hardening. It suits organisations of any size and sector that carry out or depend on manufacturing, service provision, storage, transportation or the movement of goods.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe 2022 revision moved the standard onto the ISO harmonised high-level structure, so it now runs through context of the organisation, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation and improvement under Plan-Do-Check-Act, with a risk-based approach consistent with ISO 31000. Requirements include context and interested parties, security risk assessment and treatment, a security policy and objectives, operational planning and control, competence and resources, preparedness for and response to disruptive and security-related events, and continual improvement. A security plan, a clause-by-clause compliance matrix, inspection routines and mock drill material carry those into daily operations. ISO 28000 integrates with ISO 9001, ISO 22301 and ISO 27001, complements customs and trade security programmes, and is certifiable through accredited third-party audit.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSecurity risk assessment and treatment — threats and vulnerabilities across sites, routes and partners\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSupply chain security — storage, transport, handovers and the movement of goods between parties\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSite and physical security — perimeter, access and safety inspection routines\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEmergency preparedness — security event procedures, mock drills and post-event review\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLegal and other requirements — tracking regulatory, customs and contractual obligations\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompetence and awareness — skill requirements and training for operations and security staff\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerformance evaluation — objectives monitoring, internal audit and certification readiness\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecurity and logistics managers, operations directors and risk leads at manufacturers, warehouse operators, freight forwarders and distributors whose customers now ask what happens to goods between the gate and the door. The usual trigger is a tender or partner audit demanding evidence of supply chain security, a decision to certify, or a loss or tampering incident nobody could reconstruct. You finish with an assessed risk picture, a written security plan, a drilled response and records that hold up under review.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517065113940,"sku":"AGS-08-005","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-28000-2022-Management-System.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"iso-37301-2021-cms","title":"ISO 37301 2021 CMS","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKnow every obligation the organisation is bound by, who owns it, and how a breach would come to light.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 37301:2021 sets out requirements and guidelines for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining and improving a compliance management system. Compliance obligations, in its terms, are both mandatory — laws and regulations — and voluntary: codes of conduct, contractual commitments, standards and the organisation's own values. It applies across all types, sizes and sectors, public, private and not-for-profit, and concerns boards, senior management, compliance and legal functions, risk teams and all personnel with compliance duties. It supersedes ISO 19600 and, as a type A management system standard, contains auditable requirements.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe structure is the harmonised one — context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation and improvement — driven by Plan-Do-Check-Act and grounded in good governance, integrity, transparency, accountability and sustainability. The standard asks an organisation to identify and assess its obligations and compliance risks, set a policy supported by top management and a defined compliance function, put controls in place, train and communicate, provide routes for raising concerns and whistleblowing, investigate what is reported, then monitor and improve. The risk-based approach aligns with ISO 31000, the system integrates with ISO 9001, ISO 37001 for anti-bribery and ISO 27001, and accredited certification is open to those wanting independent assurance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompliance obligations — a maintained register of applicable rules, and tracking of legal change\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompliance risk management — assessing obligations by likelihood and consequence, assigning controls\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePolicy, governance and culture — the compliance function, management commitment, code of conduct\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRaising concerns and whistleblowing — reporting routes, protection of the reporter, case handling\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIncident management and investigation — recording and remedying suspected non-compliance\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTraining, communication and competence — awareness for all personnel and role-specific duties\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvaluation and improvement — clause-wise review, internal audit and corrective action\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCompliance officers, general counsel, company secretaries and governance managers in regulated and multi-jurisdiction organisations. The purchase tends to follow a decision to certify, a regulator's enquiry, a parent company requiring a documented compliance management system, or the move on from ISO 19600. The end state is a maintained register of rules and regulations, risks assessed and owned by name, working channels for concerns, and audit records showing the system operates rather than merely exists.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517065146708,"sku":"AGS-08-006","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ISO-37301-2021-CMS.png?v=1784574577"},{"product_id":"adhics-abu-dhabi-healthcare-information-and-cyber-security-standard","title":"ADHICS V2:2024 - Abu Dhabi Healthcare Information \u0026 Cyber Security Standard","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAn ADHICS V2 information security management system for DoH-licensed healthcare entities in Abu Dhabi: governance, control domains and audit evidence, ready to adapt.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Abu Dhabi Healthcare Information and Cyber Security Standard (ADHICS), issued by the Department of Health — Abu Dhabi, is the mandatory framework for protecting health information and securing information assets across every DoH-licensed healthcare entity in the Emirate. Version 2 (2024) sets governance, risk-management and control requirements spanning human resources security, asset management, access control, operations and communications security, third-party security, information systems acquisition, incident management and business continuity, with implementation tiers scaled to entity size and criticality.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis package turns that standard into an operating management system. It fixes the ISMS scope, sets the governance structure behind it, and carries it into procedures for risk assessment and treatment, asset classification, access management, network and change control, and incident response. A domain-level self-assessment and phased implementation roadmap show where the organisation stands against each ADHICS domain and what to close first; the control families overlap enough to run alongside an existing ISO\/IEC 27001 programme.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eGovernance and policy\u003c\/strong\u003e — ISMS scope, governance structure, document and record control.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eRisk assessment, treatment and asset classification\u003c\/strong\u003e — asset register, treatment decisions, secure disposal.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eHuman resources security\u003c\/strong\u003e — confidentiality and acceptable use undertakings, role-based competence, exit clearance.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eAccess control and user account management\u003c\/strong\u003e — access requests, account administration, periodic rights review.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003ePhysical, operations and communications security\u003c\/strong\u003e — facilities protection, change management, network security.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eThird-party security and secure systems acquisition\u003c\/strong\u003e — supplier assessment, development and go-live controls.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eData privacy and incident management\u003c\/strong\u003e — protection of patient information, incident reporting and response.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eBusiness continuity, internal audit and ADHICS self-assessment\u003c\/strong\u003e — backup and restore testing, corrective action.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten for information security officers and compliance managers at DoH-licensed hospitals, clinics, support-service providers, TPAs and health-tech vendors — usually with an ADHICS audit or survey approaching and no ISMS documentation to put in front of it. You set the scope and implementation tier, adapt the procedures to how the organisation runs, and arrive at assessment with a governed system and records evidencing each control domain.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517076943188,"sku":"AGS-12-001","price":990.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/ADHICS-Abu-Dhabi-Healthcare-Information-and-Cyber-Security-Standard.png?v=1784574604"},{"product_id":"certification-iso-iec-17021-1-and-iso-iec-27006-1-iso-iec-27001-scheme","title":"Certification - ISO IEC 17021-1 \u0026 ISO IEC 27006-1 - ISO IEC 27001 Scheme","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAn ISMS certificate is only as sound as the scope and Statement of Applicability behind it.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA certification-scheme package for bodies certifying ISO\/IEC 27001 information security management systems, built on ISO\/IEC 17021-1:2015 and ISO\/IEC 27006-1, the accreditation requirements standard that adds ISMS-specific rules on auditor competence, audit time and certification documentation. Information security certificates are read closely by the client's own customers: scope wording, exclusions and the justifications recorded in the Statement of Applicability have to survive that reading, and the body must show how each was reviewed before the decision.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe audit tooling is unusually specific: checklists work through ISO\/IEC 27001:2022 clauses 4 to 10 and across all 93 Annex A controls, alongside a Stage 1 readiness review and the body's internal compliance check against ISO\/IEC 17021-1 and ISO\/IEC 27006-1. Supporting them are a quality manual, the ISMS scheme definition, and procedures for application review and agreement, audit time determination and multi-site sampling, audit planning with Stage 1 and Stage 2 execution, certification decision and certificate issue, surveillance and recertification, suspension, withdrawal and scope reduction, appeals, complaints, internal audit and management review, plus document, retention and client registers.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScope and Statement of Applicability review — boundaries, exclusions and control justifications tested before certification\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnnex A control auditing — evidence against the 93 controls of ISO\/IEC 27001:2022, plus clauses 4 to 10\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAudit time and multi-site sampling calculated on the ISMS basis set by ISO\/IEC 27006-1\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStage 1 and Stage 2 execution — readiness review, then risk treatment and control implementation on site\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCertification decision and documentation — decision record, certificate content and certified client register\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConfidentiality and impartiality — declarations covering auditors given access to client security information\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eISMS auditor competence — qualification and training programme, induction, competence matrix and annual plan\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eCertification bodies entering ISMS certification, and multi-scheme bodies whose ISO\/IEC 27001 volume has outgrown a scheme borrowed from their quality practice. The trigger is usually an accreditation application or transition against ISO\/IEC 27006-1; the scheme owner comes away with the scope review, audit time basis and control-level audit tools ready to brand.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517095915860,"sku":"AGS-15-006","price":890.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/Certification-ISO-IEC-17021-1-ISO-IEC-27006-1-ISO-IEC-27001-Scheme.png?v=1784574604"},{"product_id":"certification-iso-iec-17021-1-and-iso-iec-ts-17021-6-iso-22301-scheme","title":"Certification - ISO IEC 17021-1 \u0026 ISO IEC TS 17021-6 - ISO 22301 Scheme","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBusiness continuity certification rests on proof that plans have been exercised, not merely written.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis package equips a certification body to certify ISO 22301:2019 business continuity management systems under ISO\/IEC 17021-1:2015, with BCMS auditor competence requirements drawn from ISO\/IEC TS 17021-6. The audit has a distinct evidence base: business impact analysis, risk assessment, the continuity strategies chosen from them, and the exercise and testing programme showing the arrangements were rehearsed. The auditor guidance is written around that sequence, so audits examine capability rather than the existence of a plan document.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBehind the audit sits everything needed to run the scheme. The quality manual establishes governance, impartiality and the body's own management system; the scheme document defines the ISO 22301 programme. Procedures handle application, review, audit time and contract; audit programme management and planning; initial certification across Stage 1 and Stage 2, then surveillance and recertification audits; certification decision, certificate issue and directory entry; special audits, suspension, withdrawal and changes of scope; marks and claims; appeals, complaints, internal audit and management review. An ISO 22301:2019 certification audit checklist, a Stage 1 readiness review checklist and an internal ISO\/IEC 17021-1 conformity checklist complete the toolkit.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContinuity capability auditing — business impact analysis, risk assessment and the strategies derived from them\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExercising and testing evidence — how a client's exercise programme is evaluated at Stage 2 and in surveillance\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAudit programme and audit time — determined at application review, then planned across the certification cycle\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDecision, certificate and directory — recording the decision and publishing the certified client entry\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBCMS auditor competence to ISO\/IEC TS 17021-6 — evaluation and authorisation, course outline, CPD records\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScheme integrity — special audits, suspension, withdrawal, scope change, marks, claims, complaints and appeals\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eEstablished certification bodies adding business continuity to a portfolio that already carries quality, security or safety schemes, and specialist resilience firms building a certification arm. The decision usually follows client demand for ISO 22301 certificates or an accreditation scope extension; the body gains a documented scheme, auditor guidance and competence criteria it can brand and put in front of an assessor.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517096079700,"sku":"AGS-15-007","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/Certification-ISO-IEC-17021-1-ISO-IEC-TS-17021-6-ISO-22301-Scheme.png?v=1784574604"},{"product_id":"certification-iso-iec-17021-1-and-iso-ts-17021-9-iso-370012016-scheme","title":"Certification Scheme - ISO\/IEC 17021-1 \u0026 ISO\/TS 17021-9 - ISO 37001:2016","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertify anti-bribery management systems on a scheme built for the scrutiny an ISO 37001 certificate attracts.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCertification-scheme documentation for bodies certifying ISO 37001:2016 anti-bribery management systems under ISO\/IEC 17021-1:2015, with ABMS auditor competence taken from ISO\/TS 17021-9. Anti-bribery certification is unusually sensitive work: the audit team must evaluate the client's bribery risk assessment, the due diligence applied to business associates, the financial and non-financial controls that follow from that risk picture, and the commitment shown by the governing body and top management. A decision that cannot be evidenced here exposes the certification body as much as the client.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA Quality Manual establishes the governance and impartiality mechanism of the body, and the scheme document defines ISO 37001 certification as it will be operated. Procedures take a client from application review and audit-time determination through Stage 1 and Stage 2, the certification decision, surveillance and recertification, suspension, withdrawal and scope change, appeals and complaints, and the control of marks and claims. Guidance on auditing ISO 37001 and on setting audit time keeps that judgement consistent as the auditor pool grows, in a market — governance, banking, construction, public procurement — where the certificate is increasingly demanded.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBribery risk assessment and due diligence on business associates — what the audit team tests\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFinancial and non-financial controls, and the top-management commitment behind them\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eApplication review and audit-time determination, with written guidance behind the time set\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStage 1 readiness, Stage 2 conduct and reporting, nonconformity and corrective action\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCertification decision, certificate issue, surveillance, recertification and scope change\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImpartiality, conflict of interest and confidentiality declarations, and the treatment of threats\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eABMS auditor competence under ISO\/TS 17021-9 — evaluation, authorisation and training\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCertification bodies adding ISO 37001 to their scope, and new bodies preparing for assessment against ISO\/IEC 17021-1 and ISO\/TS 17021-9. The trigger is a scope-extension application, or clients in banking, construction and public-sector supply asking for anti-bribery certification the body cannot yet offer. What follows is a written scheme, a defined competence route, and a record behind every decision from application to certificate.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517097062740,"sku":"AGS-15-008","price":590.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/Certification-ISO-IEC-17021-1-ISO-TS-17021-9-ISO-370012016-Scheme.png?v=1784574604"},{"product_id":"certification-iso-iec-17021-12015-and-iso-iec-ts-17021-132021-iso-37301-scheme","title":"Certification Scheme - ISO\/IEC 17021-1:2015 \u0026 ISO\/IEC TS 17021-13:2021 - ISO 37301","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe scheme documentation a certification body needs in place before it can answer an ISO 37301 enquiry.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 37301:2021 has become the reference standard for demonstrating organisational compliance capability to regulators, courts and business partners, and the bodies asked to certify it need a scheme that holds up. This set operates one under ISO\/IEC 17021-1:2015, with CMS auditor competence requirements set by ISO\/IEC TS 17021-13:2021. What separates a compliance audit from a generic management-system audit is the subject matter: the register of compliance obligations, the risk assessment behind it, the controls that treat those risks, and the compliance culture that decides whether any of it holds in practice.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA Quality Manual establishes the governance and impartiality framework of the body, and the scheme document defines ISO 37301 certification as offered. Procedures run the cycle from application review and the certification agreement through audit programme design with audit time and team selection, Stage 1 and Stage 2, the decision and issue of certificates, surveillance and recertification, suspension, appeals and complaints. Competence is where assessment of a new scheme concentrates, so an audit team competence checklist written against ISO\/IEC TS 17021-13, a documented auditor qualification pathway and CMS auditing guidance sit beside the certification audit checklist.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompliance obligations and compliance risk — testing the register and the assessment that drives the controls\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompliance culture — the evidence gathered to judge it and how that judgement is recorded\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eApplication review, audit-time determination and audit team selection\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStage 1 readiness review through Stage 2 conduct, reporting and nonconformity handling\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCertification decision, certificate issue, surveillance, recertification and scope change\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImpartiality and confidentiality, with appeals and complaints kept independent of the audit\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCMS auditor competence under ISO\/IEC TS 17021-13:2021 — qualification pathway, evaluation and training\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCertification bodies opening or extending an accredited scope to ISO 37301, and scheme managers who must show an assessor a documented CMS competence route before the first audit is scheduled. The pressure arrives from the market, as organisations under regulatory or counterparty expectation ask who can certify them. The outcome is a defined scheme, a documented qualification pathway, and decisions traceable from application to certificate.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517097423188,"sku":"AGS-15-009","price":590.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/Certification-ISO-IEC-17021-12015-ISO-IEC-TS-17021-132021-ISO-37301-Scheme.png?v=1784574604"},{"product_id":"certification-iso-iec-17021-12015-and-adhics-v0-92019-healthcare-information-and-cyber-security-scheme","title":"Certification Scheme - ISO\/IEC 17021-1:2015 \u0026 ADHICS V2:2024 Healthcare Information \u0026 Cyber Security","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eADHICS is mandatory for licensed healthcare entities in Abu Dhabi; this is the documented scheme for the body that assesses them against it.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eADHICS, the Abu Dhabi Healthcare Information and Cyber Security Standard, is mandated by the Department of Health across licensed healthcare entities, and that mandate has created demand for competent third-party assessment few audit bodies are documented to meet. This is a specialised certification-scheme package for bodies auditing and certifying ADHICS compliance under ISO\/IEC 17021-1:2015. Its scheme document maps the control domains of the standard, so an audit is structured around health-information governance and cyber-security controls as ADHICS defines them, not a general information-security checklist borrowed from another scheme.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA Quality Manual establishes the management system and impartiality safeguards of the assessing body. Procedures then govern the cycle: application and review, audit programme management and planning, Stage 1 and Stage 2 conduct, the certification decision and certificate issue, surveillance, recertification and special audits, suspension, restoration and scope change, appeals, complaints, personnel competence and internal audit. An ADHICS control-based audit checklist, an internal checklist against ISO\/IEC 17021-1, auditor guidance and a competence development programme complete the kit, which pairs with our ADHICS implementation documentation — one package for the healthcare provider, this one for the body that assesses it.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eADHICS control domains — structuring the certification audit around the control set of the standard\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAudit-time determination for licensed healthcare entities of differing size and complexity\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStage 1 and Stage 2 conduct, audit reporting, nonconformity and corrective action requests\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCertification decision, certificate issue, surveillance, recertification and special audits\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuditor competence in health-information security — qualification, authorisation and monitoring\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImpartiality, confidentiality and conflict of interest across the personnel of the assessing body\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCertified client directory, auditor register and records retention\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAudit and certification bodies assessing ADHICS compliance for Abu Dhabi healthcare providers, whether already established in the emirate or entering it. The trigger is the Department of Health mandate reaching their client base faster than their own documentation. The outcome is a scheme written down, a competence route defined for health-information security auditors, and an audit trail from application to certificate that a client or an accreditation assessor can follow.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56517097881940,"sku":"AGS-15-012","price":990.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/Certification-ISO-IEC-17021-12015-ADHICS-v0-92019-Healthcare-Information-Cyber-S.png?v=1784574604"},{"product_id":"ags-information-security-policy-isms-package","title":"Information Security Policy \u0026 ISMS Package","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe difference between a set of policies and a working ISMS is what the team does in the first hour of an incident.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eMost security documentation stops at the statement of intent. This information security management system takes password management, access control, encryption and key management, backup, incident response, email security, mobile devices and clean desk practice down to the step a technician actually performs. It is aligned to ISO\/IEC 27001 and informed by NIST SP 800-53 control families, with a master document index (AGS-ISMS-000) holding the numbering and the annual review cycle together.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe situations it covers are the ones that arrive without warning: the first hour after a suspected ransomware infection, a user-reported phishing email waiting to be triaged, a device reported lost or stolen, a monthly restore test that has to prove the backup is real. Each domain carries its own measures, so a control can be shown operating rather than declared.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eIdentity and access\u003c\/strong\u003e — password standards, granting and removing user access, and reviews of who still holds what\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eCryptography and key management\u003c\/strong\u003e — encryption requirements, the key lifecycle, and issuing and installing a TLS certificate\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eBackup and recovery\u003c\/strong\u003e — what is backed up and protected, proven by a monthly restore test\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eIncident response\u003c\/strong\u003e — detection, triage and containment, with a defined first hour for suspected ransomware and a closing record\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEmail security\u003c\/strong\u003e — mail protection and acceptable use, and triage of a phishing message a user reports\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eMobile and endpoint\u003c\/strong\u003e — device enrolment and configuration, and the response to a lost or stolen device\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003ePhysical and desk security\u003c\/strong\u003e — clean desk expectations and the after-hours sweep that verifies them\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eMeasurement and risk\u003c\/strong\u003e — access reviews completed, restore tests passed and phishing reports handled, with risk scored the same way everywhere\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eBuilt for CISOs, IT managers and security or GRC leads in SMEs pursuing ISO\/IEC 27001 certification, and for teams whose enterprise customers send vendor security questionnaires faster than documentation can be written. Once the domains are mapped to your own infrastructure and tooling, one set of documents serves the certification audit, the customer questionnaire and the engineer on call, with consistent numbering, an annual review point and evidence behind each control.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56792709005652,"sku":"AGS-01-031","price":790.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-01-009_Information_Security_Policy.png?v=1786639546"},{"product_id":"saudi-pdpl-compliance-management-system","title":"Saudi PDPL Compliance Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented Saudi PDPL compliance management system, from gap assessment and records of processing through to breach response and defensible destruction records.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Saudi Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) — Royal Decree M\/19 of 9\/2\/1443H, as amended by Royal Decree M\/148 of 5\/9\/1444H — governs how the personal data of individuals in the Kingdom is collected, processed, disclosed and transferred. Together with its Implementing Regulation and the Regulation on Personal Data Transfer outside the Kingdom, and under the supervision of the Saudi Data \u0026amp; AI Authority (SDAIA), it imposes concrete duties: lawful bases and consent management, privacy notices, data subject rights handling, records of processing activities, controller–processor arrangements, transfer assessments, breach notification and secure destruction.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMeeting those duties is a documentation exercise as much as a legal one. Regulators, auditors and counterparties expect approved policies, working procedures, completed registers and an evidence trail — not a legal memo. This system provides that documented layer: a controlled set of Word and Excel documents built on the official Saudi sources, with every requirement tagged to distinguish legal obligations under the PDPL and its regulations from organisational controls and recommended practice.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe system is organised as a working management loop. An apex compliance manual sets the framework; policies and procedures sit with their operational domains — privacy governance and the DPO role, data subject rights, consent, data sharing and disclosure, processor management, international transfers, retention and destruction, and data security and breach management. Fillable forms, Excel registers and checklists turn each procedure into evidence, and a regulatory compliance matrix maps PDPL Articles 1–43 and Implementing Regulation Articles 1–38 to the documents that satisfy them.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGap assessment methodology and checklists to baseline your current position\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eROPA management and a ready-to-populate register of processing activities\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDPIA screening, international transfer assessments and processor due diligence\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBreach assessment and response procedures with notification content templates\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInternal audit, corrective action, management review and a full training pack\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBuilt for data protection officers, privacy and compliance managers, and legal counsel in organisations operating in Saudi Arabia — and for international groups whose processing of Saudi personal data brings them within the PDPL's scope. It suits banks, insurers, healthcare providers, retailers and technology companies alike, and gives consultancies a consistent, source-traceable foundation for delivering PDPL programmes across clients.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017074418004,"sku":"AGS-19-001","price":1950.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-19-001.png?v=1788398406"},{"product_id":"saudi-dpo-management-system","title":"Saudi DPO Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA complete governance system for the Data Protection Officer function under the Saudi PDPL — from the appointment decision through to the annual privacy and compliance report.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Saudi Personal Data Protection Law (Royal Decree M\/19 of 1443H, as amended by Royal Decree M\/148 of 1444H) and its Implementing Regulation place the Data Protection Officer at the centre of a controller's compliance architecture, and SDAIA's Rules for Appointing Personal Data Protection Officer (Version 1.0, August 2024) now define the appointment cases, competencies, duties and safeguards of the role in binding detail. Appointing someone is the easy part; what SDAIA, auditors and boards look for is a governed function — documented authority and independence, planned monitoring, recorded advice, and reporting that stands up to inspection.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis system documents that function end to end. Every stated legal obligation is traceable to a named Saudi instrument and article, and a six-class requirement legend keeps the line between law, internal rule and AGS professional practice visible in every document — anything not verifiable against the official sources is flagged rather than asserted. A regulatory source inventory records the eighteen official instruments analysed, from the Law and Implementing Regulation to SDAIA's transfer regulation and the NDMO Data Management and Personal Data Protection Standards (v1.5).\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation runs the full lifecycle of the DPO function. It opens with the controlling layer — a governance and operations manual, governance policy, independence and conflict policy, terms of reference, role description and competency framework — then moves through appointment and designation, including the applicability assessment against the three mandatory appointment cases and the voluntary route. An operating model, annual work plan and RACI matrix set how the function runs day to day, and dedicated procedure, form and register sets cover each oversight domain:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompliance monitoring and privacy risk review\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdvisory and consultation, with recorded advice\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eROPA and DPIA oversight\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData subject rights, incident and breach review\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProcessor oversight and international transfers\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAround that core sit monthly, quarterly and annual DPO reporting, internal audit of the function itself with self-assessment and maturity scoring, corrective action, management review, training and awareness, document control and records management, and a phased implementation roadmap with a regulatory compliance matrix that maps every document back to the articles it serves.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten for the person who holds — or is about to hold — the DPO title in a Saudi controller or processor, and for those who govern that person: heads of data management offices, legal counsel, compliance and risk leaders, and executives accountable for PDPL compliance. It suits organisations that fall under one of SDAIA's mandatory appointment cases, entities appointing voluntarily ahead of obligation, and consultancies standing up or maturing DPO functions for clients across the Kingdom. Where a broader PDPL compliance programme already exists, this system slots in as its oversight layer; where none exists, it gives the DPO a defensible starting position.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017074516308,"sku":"AGS-19-002","price":1150.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-19-002.png?v=1788398410"},{"product_id":"saudi-ropa-compliance-management-system","title":"Saudi ROPA Compliance Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented Saudi ROPA compliance management system under Article 31 of the PDPL — from processing-activity discovery through to an approved, inspection-ready Record of Processing Activities.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eArticle 31 of the Saudi Personal Data Protection Law (issued by Royal Decree No. M\/19 of 1443 AH and amended by Royal Decree No. M\/148 of 1444 AH) requires controllers to maintain records of their processing activities and make them available to the Competent Authority. Article 33 of the Implementing Regulation sharpens the duty: records must be written, accurate and up to date, cover eight minimum content items, and be retained for five years after processing ends. SDAIA's Personal Data Processing Activities Records Guideline sets out the expected field structure, and the Regulation on Personal Data Transfer outside the Kingdom (Version 2.0, August 2024) governs what must be recorded about cross-border flows.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis system turns that obligation into a controlled, operable documentation set. Governance policies establish ownership under the Data Protection Officer; a twenty-step methodology takes each processing activity through discovery, content, assessment, completion and maintenance; procedures cover every stage of building and keeping the record; and linked Excel registers hold the master ROPA, processors, international transfers and retention schedules. Every substantive statement carries a Class A–F classification separating binding legal requirements, cited to article, from organisational controls and AGS recommended practice — so each line of the record can be defended to an auditor or to the Competent Authority.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation follows the full lifecycle of a Record of Processing Activities: establishing governance, building the record activity by activity, assuring its quality and keeping it accurate for the life of each activity.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eGovernance\u003c\/strong\u003e — the apex compliance manual, policies for ROPA governance, processing inventory, data mapping, review and change management, and the phased AGS methodology\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eRecord building\u003c\/strong\u003e — procedures for activity identification, data classification and mapping, purpose assessment, processor and recipient identification, international transfer identification, retention and security documentation, and DPIA screening and linkage\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eWorking tools\u003c\/strong\u003e — a master ROPA template aligned to the Article 33 content items, a discovery questionnaire, data-flow mapping templates, and Excel registers with completeness and quality checklists\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eAssurance\u003c\/strong\u003e — an internal audit programme, management review cycle, and corrective action process with findings registers\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eDeployment\u003c\/strong\u003e — implementation guide and project plan, department-level guidance, a training programme with awareness presentation, and a regulatory compliance matrix traced to the official Saudi sources\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData Protection Officers and privacy leads in organisations subject to the PDPL; compliance, legal and GRC teams building or remediating a Saudi privacy programme; and consultancies delivering ROPA engagements for Saudi clients. It suits controllers of any size that need a defensible record — whether preparing for registration on the National Register of Controllers, responding to a request from the Competent Authority, or bringing an existing inventory up to Implementing Regulation standard.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017074549076,"sku":"AGS-19-003","price":950.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-19-003.png?v=1788398413"},{"product_id":"saudi-privacy-risk-dpia-compliance-management-system","title":"Saudi Privacy Risk \u0026 DPIA Compliance Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented privacy risk and DPIA capability under the Saudi PDPL — from the screening gate through to a defensible, evidenced impact assessment record.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Saudi Personal Data Protection Law (Royal Decree M\/19 of 1443H, as amended by Royal Decree M\/148 of 1444H) creates the impact assessment obligation at Article 22, and Article 25 of its Implementing Regulation makes it operational: four mandatory assessment cases and eight minimum elements every assessment must contain. Article 32 places supervision of impact assessment procedures with the Data Protection Officer, and the Regulation on Personal Data Transfer outside the Kingdom adds a further risk assessment before defined cross-border transfers — elaborated in SDAIA's Risk Assessment Guideline of February 2025. What the framework does not prescribe is a method: no scoring scale, no risk matrix, no numeric threshold.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis management system supplies both halves. The legal requirements are extracted at article level in a pre-implementation regulatory analysis, classified as mandatory or recommended, and traced through a regulatory compliance matrix into the policies, procedures, forms and registers that implement them. Where the law is silent, the system provides clearly labelled AGS methodologies — a privacy risk scoring model and a fifteen-phase DPIA method that delivers every Article 25(2) element in an order that produces sound analysis rather than a completed form. Legal statement and professional judgement are separated at every point, so your choices can be explained to the Competent Authority.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation runs the full assessment lifecycle: a screening gate designed to sit inside your project, procurement and IT change processes; the assessment itself; risk treatment and residual-risk decisions; DPO review; and reassessment when processing changes. Around that core sits the governance layer a functioning system needs — evidence management, regulatory change monitoring, internal audit, management review, corrective action, document control and records retention aligned to the Implementing Regulation's retention rules.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA parent compliance manual covering what, who, when, how and what evidence for every activity\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScreening, DPIA, treatment, review and reassessment procedures with matching forms\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExcel registers for privacy risks, DPIAs, controls, treatments, actions, findings and evidence\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA regulatory compliance matrix and master cross-reference matrix for end-to-end traceability\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA trainer-led course with participant manual, presentation, exercises and competency assessment\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA phased implementation roadmap with deliverables, exit criteria and dependencies\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData Protection Officers and privacy managers who must stand up an assessment capability that will withstand SDAIA scrutiny; compliance, risk and legal teams in Saudi controllers building PDPL programmes; and consultancies delivering privacy risk and DPIA engagements in the Kingdom. It suits organisations formalising ad-hoc assessment practice as much as those starting from nothing — the documents are templated for tailoring, and the analysis annex tells you exactly which points must be verified with qualified Saudi counsel before reliance.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017075204436,"sku":"AGS-19-004","price":1250.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-19-004.png?v=1788398417"},{"product_id":"dora-ict-third-party-risk-digital-operational-resilience-management-system","title":"DORA ICT Third-Party Risk \u0026 Digital Operational Resilience Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented DORA management system under Regulation (EU) 2022\/2554 — from ICT risk governance and major-incident reporting to the Register of Information, threat-led penetration testing and a defensible exit strategy for every critical provider.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Digital Operational Resilience Act — Regulation (EU) 2022\/2554 — has applied to financial entities across the EU since 17 January 2025. It replaces fragmented ICT guidance with a single supervisory regime spanning ICT risk management, incident classification and reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk and information sharing. Responsibility sits explicitly with the management body, and supervisors expect a documented, evidenced framework rather than a collection of ad hoc controls.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis toolkit documents that framework end to end. It is built against DORA and its Level-2 measures — Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2024\/1772 on incident classification, 2024\/1773 on the third-party policy and 2024\/1774 on the ICT risk management framework, and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024\/2956 on the Register of Information — with a regulatory version-control register and change log that track the 2025 acts on incident reporting ((EU) 2025\/301 and 2025\/302), subcontracting ((EU) 2025\/532) and TLPT ((EU) 2025\/1190), so each is confirmed against the Official Journal before the dependent controls are relied upon.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA management manual anchors the system; policies and procedures then work through each obligation in operating detail, supported by forms, checklists and Excel registers, calculators and dashboards that become your live compliance records. A requirements traceability matrix maps the documentation back to the regulation, and a seventeen-phase implementation roadmap, guidance library and training modules take the team from the initial applicability assessment through to management review and internal audit. The modules cover:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eICT risk management — asset inventory, dependency mapping and critical or important function identification\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIncident management — classification, significant cyber threat assessment and major-incident reporting\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResilience testing and TLPT governance\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe full third-party lifecycle — due diligence, contractual compliance, subcontracting and fourth-party risk, concentration risk, monitoring and exit\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Register of Information, with data-quality validation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDigital operational resilience — business impact analysis, impact tolerances, continuity, disaster recovery, crisis management and a severe-but-plausible scenario library\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHeads of ICT risk and operational resilience, DORA compliance officers, CISOs and third-party risk managers at banks, insurers, investment firms, payment and e-money institutions and crypto-asset service providers within the scope of DORA — and the consultancies building DORA programmes for them. It suits entities documenting the regime for the first time as well as those consolidating scattered artefacts into one traceable system ahead of a supervisory review.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017075269972,"sku":"AGS-20-001","price":2450.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-20-001.png?v=1788398420"},{"product_id":"third-party-risk-management-system-tprm","title":"Third-Party Risk Management System (TPRM)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA complete third-party risk management system — from vendor identification and due diligence through residual-risk assessment, continuous monitoring, audit and offboarding — informed by ISO\/IEC 27036, ISO 31000:2018 and NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMost organisations now run on other organisations: cloud platforms, SaaS providers, outsourced processors, critical suppliers. Regulators and certification auditors have followed the risk outward — ISO\/IEC 27001:2022 sharpened its supplier controls (Annex A 5.19–5.22), ISO 22301:2019 expects continuity across outsourced activities, and NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 (updated 2024) sets the reference for supply-chain risk practice. What most vendor programmes actually run on, though, is a spreadsheet of contract dates and a backlog of unanswered questionnaires.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis toolkit documents a proprietary AGS framework informed by ISO 31000:2018, ISO\/IEC 27036 Parts 1–3, ISO\/IEC 27001:2022, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 19011:2026, NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1, NIST SP 1326 and NIST SP 800-18 Rev. 2. Its assessment methodology keeps inherent risk, control effectiveness and residual risk as separate quantities across fourteen risk domains, so that only residual risk drives decisions, while a twelve-factor weighted criticality model sets how deep each relationship's due diligence, assessment and monitoring regime must go. A reference and alignment matrix maps every system requirement to the source clauses — including the NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SR control family — together with the evidence each control produces. It is not an ISO standard and makes no certification claim; it is the documented machinery of a defensible programme.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation is tiered the way a mature management system is: a system manual defines governance, scope and the lifecycle; policies state the mandatory rules and risk appetite; procedures define how each activity is executed, by whom, and with what records; forms, checklists and Excel registers capture the evidence that it happened. Guidance documents and training modules carry the reasoning, so the method survives staff turnover. The whole set follows one lifecycle: identify, classify, due diligence, assess, approve, onboard, monitor, audit, remediate, reassess, offboard.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA fourteen-domain residual-risk engine with matching Excel calculators, registers and a KPI dashboard\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpecialist modules for cybersecurity assessment, data privacy, business continuity, due diligence, audit and remediation\/CAPA\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEnhanced regimes for critical third parties, fourth-party and concentration risk — including AI and emerging-technology vendors\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSector checklists for cloud, SaaS and IT service providers, plus a portable Third-Party Risk Passport for each vendor\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChief risk officers and heads of vendor management building or formalising a TPRM programme; CISOs and information security teams answering for supplier controls under ISO\/IEC 27001:2022; procurement, compliance and resilience leads in regulated sectors; and internal auditors and consultancies deploying a complete, editable system across clients. It suits vendor estates from a few dozen relationships to several hundred — the criticality model is what keeps the effort proportionate.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017075597652,"sku":"AGS-20-002","price":1750.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-20-002.png?v=1788398424"},{"product_id":"supplier-compliance-management-system","title":"Supplier Compliance Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAn integrated supplier compliance management system — from registration and due diligence through risk scoring, approval and audit to scorecard-driven re-evaluation.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen a supplier fails, the consequences land on the buyer. ISO 9001:2015 makes control of externally provided processes, products and services (clause 8.4) the purchasing organisation's responsibility, and certification auditors, customers and regulators increasingly expect a defensible answer to the same question: how do you know your suppliers are qualified, monitored and still fit to supply? An approved supplier list on its own is not an answer — a documented lifecycle is.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis toolkit is a complete, proprietary supplier compliance management system built around that lifecycle: qualify, classify, assess, approve, verify, audit, monitor, improve, re-evaluate. It was developed with reference to ISO 9001:2015, ISO 20400:2017 (sustainable procurement), ISO 19011:2018 (auditing management systems) and selected principles of ISO 44001:2017, with a cross-reference matrix mapping the system back to those standards. It is not a certification scheme; it is the working documentation a supplier management function actually runs on.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe governing manual sets the framework, and the procedure layer carries a supplier through every stage of the relationship — identification and registration, due diligence, criticality classification, risk assessment, prequalification, evaluation and approval, compliance verification, on-site and remote audit, performance monitoring, nonconformity and CAPA, re-evaluation, and formal suspension, disqualification and reinstatement. The quantitative core is fully specified rather than left to judgement: a 17-factor risk model across four weighted domains with control-effectiveness adjustment, defined risk bands and mandatory escalation rules; four-level criticality classification; a weighted K1–K8 performance scorecard graded A to E; and S1–S12 KPIs for the system itself. The forms and registers generate the audit evidence — from the due diligence questionnaire and approved supplier list to the Supplier Compliance Passport, a consolidated one-supplier compliance summary.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSector checklist library: manufacturing, food, packaging, raw materials, service providers, logistics, healthcare, pharmaceutical and IT suppliers, plus environmental, social-ethical, information security and business continuity modules\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExcel working tools: supplier register, risk and evaluation calculators, performance scorecard, KPI and compliance dashboards, audit and CAPA trackers, certificate and licence expiry tracker\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTraining modules covering the full curriculum from supplier qualification to KPIs and internal system review, with exercises, cases and answer keys\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTemplates and letters: supplier code of conduct, quality agreement, confidentiality agreement, and formal approval, suspension and disqualification correspondence\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImplementation set: twelve-phase roadmap, master document register, internal audit checklist of the system, management review framework, standards cross-reference matrix and glossary\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHeads of procurement, supply chain and vendor management building or formalising an approved supplier programme; quality and compliance managers who must evidence supplier control under ISO 9001:2015 or customer audit; and organisations in manufacturing, food, pharmaceutical, healthcare, logistics and services whose supplier base is now part of their own compliance exposure. Consultants implementing supplier qualification and monitoring programmes for clients will find the system deployable as delivered, with the roadmap and training layer supporting rollout.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017075630420,"sku":"AGS-20-003","price":1450.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-20-003.png?v=1788398427"},{"product_id":"supply-chain-security-resilience-business-continuity-ims","title":"Supply Chain Security, Resilience \u0026 Business Continuity IMS","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented supply chain security, resilience and business continuity management system built on ISO 28000:2022 and ISO 22301:2019 on an ISO 9001:2015 spine — from threat and impact assessment through to tested recovery.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSupply chain security and business continuity are usually run as separate programmes: one protects goods, sites and shipments against deliberate and accidental harm; the other decides what the organisation does when a critical supplier, route or warehouse fails anyway. ISO 28000:2022 (with Amd.1:2024) and ISO 22301:2019 share the same high-level management-system structure, and this toolkit implements them as a single integrated system, using ISO 9001:2015 as the management spine and the ISO 22000:2018 interface clauses — external provider control, traceability, emergency preparedness and recall — for organisations in the food chain.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe architecture is deliberately layered. An integrated manual states what the system is; procedures state how each process runs; forms capture what happened; registers index the evidence an auditor will ask for. A clause-by-clause compliance matrix ties each requirement to its process, documents, evidence and audit question, and every citation carries an explicit verification status — recommended practice is labelled as such, never presented as an ISO requirement. No RTO, MTPD, KPI target or retention period is pre-set: those decisions are marked for the organisation to determine, with worked examples flagged as illustrative only.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe document set follows the working life of a supply chain rather than the clause order of the standards. It opens with context and supply chain mapping, twin security and resilience risk assessments and a business impact analysis, then moves through supplier due diligence, qualification, scorecarding and third-party risk management. The operational security layer covers:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ephysical security, warehouse security and inventory protection;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003etransportation and shipment security, with matching inspection registers;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003etraceability and product or material recall;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ethe cyber and IT supply chain incident interface.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the resilience side, a business continuity plan framework, emergency response and crisis management plans and a recovery procedure are exercised against a scenario library running from critical supplier failure and warehouse fire to a cyberattack on supply chain systems and a simultaneous supplier-and-logistics disruption. The governance loop — internal audit, nonconformity and corrective action, management review, KPI monitoring, document control and records management — closes the system, and a seventeen-phase implementation roadmap with a readiness checklist sets the build order. A trainer guide, participant manual and presentation support the rollout.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSupply chain, logistics and procurement directors accountable for continuity of supply; security and resilience managers implementing ISO 28000 or ISO 22301; quality managers extending an ISO 9001:2015 system into supplier and continuity risk; and operations leaders in manufacturing, distribution, warehousing and third-party logistics. Organisations in the food chain get the ISO 22000:2018 traceability, emergency response and recall interfaces ready-made, and consultants can use the compliance matrix and roadmap to run the same build for clients.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017075695956,"sku":"AGS-20-004","price":1650.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-20-004.png?v=1788398430"},{"product_id":"ims-for-uae-e-invoicing-accredited-service-providers-iso-iec-27001-iso-22301-md-64-2025","title":"IMS for UAE E-Invoicing Accredited Service Providers (ISO\/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, MD 64\/2025)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAn integrated ISO\/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO 22301:2019 management system for UAE e-invoicing Accredited Service Providers, engineered around Ministerial Decision No. 64 of 2025 — from a two-stream risk method through to a Ministry-ready evidence index.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccreditation as a UAE e-invoicing service provider is a double examination. Ministerial Decision No. 64 of 2025 on Electronic Invoicing (as amended by Ministerial Decision No. 56 of 2026) sets information security and business continuity obligations for Accredited Service Providers, and demonstrating them in practice means holding a management system that a certification body will certify against ISO\/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO 22301:2019 — while a Ministry of Finance accreditation reviewer reads the same documents against the Decision's articles. Most documentation sets serve one audience; this one is written to withstand both.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis toolkit is a single integrated management system, not two standards stapled together. A tiered documentation scheme runs from the apex IMS Manual and combined information security and business continuity policy, through operating procedures, into the forms, registers, checklists, guidance and training that produce the records both examiners will ask to see. A master Integration \u0026amp; Compliance Matrix traces every clause of both standards — and the Decision's key articles, including 5(2), 9, 17 and 18(2)(c) — to the specific document and record that satisfies it.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe system covers the full management-system lifecycle for both standards under one governance structure: context and scope, leadership and roles, integrated risk management, the Statement of Applicability and Annex A control management, competence and communication, internal audit, management review, nonconformity and improvement. Operationally it reaches into the controls an e-invoicing provider actually runs — access control and identity, cryptographic key and certificate management, logging and security operations, data residency and cloud security, supplier and third-party security, secure development, incident response, business impact analysis, continuity strategies and plans, ICT readiness, and a standing exercising and testing programme. Several regulator-facing mechanisms are built in as hard rules rather than suggestions:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRisk assessment and BIA run as two separate analytical streams, with BIA availability findings transferring into risk treatment — never merged into one exercise.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvery change record carries an Article 18(2)(c) Ministry-notification gate; a blank gate blocks approval.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eArticle 9 safeguard controls can never be excluded from the Statement of Applicability.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eValidated End User complaints cannot close without a corrective action, and no continuity plan may target objectives that do not trace to the approved BIA.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDedicated checklists cover ISO 27001 gap analysis, ISO 22301 readiness, Annex A controls, MD 64 regulatory compliance and the Ministry submission evidence index, while the legal register tracks the related instruments — the FTA reporting decisions, PINT AE data dictionary versions and emirate-level frameworks — as verifiable items rather than assumptions. A phased implementation roadmap and mapped guidance documents take a team from first placeholder to submission.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSoftware houses, fintechs and billing platforms preparing an Accredited Service Provider application to the UAE Ministry of Finance; IMS managers, CISOs and business continuity coordinators tasked with achieving ISO\/IEC 27001 and ISO 22301 certification on an accreditation deadline; and consultants running ASP readiness engagements who need a defensible, article-traceable documentation base rather than generic ISMS templates. It suits both new market entrants building their first management system and established providers aligning an existing ISMS with the Decision's specific gates.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017075892564,"sku":"AGS-21-001","price":1850.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-21-001.png?v=1788398435"},{"product_id":"integrated-organizational-resilience-management-system-kit-iorms","title":"Integrated Organizational Resilience Management System Kit (IORMS)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented organizational resilience management system that treats business continuity as one capability among sixteen — from governance and business impact analysis through crisis, cyber and supply chain resilience to exercising, audit and management review.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOrganizational resilience asks a harder question than business continuity alone: not \"can we restore this process?\" but \"can the whole chain beneath each critical service stay within the harm your customers and regulators will tolerate?\" The IORMS kit documents a single, integrated management system built for that question. Its architecture follows the clause structure of ISO 22301:2019 (including Amendment 1:2024) with the guidance of ISO 22313:2020; the business impact analysis subsystem is designed to ISO\/TS 22317:2021; incident management draws on ISO 22320; risk management is anchored to ISO 31000:2018; and the cyber and technology layer uses the taxonomy of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (2024).\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEvery document is original, editable material — nothing here reproduces standard text. The value is in the connections: a business impact analysis that sizes a strategy, that becomes a plan, that is exercised, that produces a finding, that becomes a tracked corrective action, that reaches management review. A framework crosswalk maps the whole system to ISO 22301 clause numbers, NIST CSF 2.0 Functions and DORA articles, and a controlled reference matrix records exactly which edition of every source the kit was built against — so alignment claims can be evidenced rather than asserted.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe system is organized as sixteen capability layers under one governance spine: a management manual, a governance charter with committee terms of reference and a RACI, and a policy set spanning every layer from enterprise risk to competence and awareness. Beneath that spine sit the working subsystems:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalysis — risk method and scoring, resilience strategy and maturity assessment, and a full BIA subsystem with methodology, interview and workshop guide, questionnaire and scoring workbook;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePlanning and response — business continuity, crisis management, incident, recovery and emergency preparedness, each with procedures and plan templates;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOperational resilience — critical service identification and mapping, impact tolerance setting, and live service registers and assessment workbooks;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExtended enterprise — supplier criticality and resilience assessment, monitoring and exit, and third-party resilience governance;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCyber and technology — cyber resilience assessment, technology recovery planning and backup-and-restore verification;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAssurance — an exercise programme with scenario library, a KPI dashboard, internal audit, management review, and nonconformity and lessons-learned procedures.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA phased implementation roadmap with go\/no-go gates, a role-based training programme, and a worked end-to-end example that reconciles to the shipped workbooks show you how the layers connect in practice. An optional DORA sector module maps the system to Regulation (EU) 2022\/2554 for in-scope financial entities — ICT risk framework mapping, incident classification and reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk and a register of information template.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHeads of business continuity and resilience stepping up from standalone BCM to an integrated resilience remit; chief risk and operations officers who want continuity, crisis, cyber and supplier resilience run as one system rather than four; and operational resilience and ICT risk leads in financial services preparing for DORA. It suits mid-size to large organizations building a resilience function on a defensible, auditable baseline, and consultancies delivering resilience programmes to a consistent, evidenced method.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017076121940,"sku":"AGS-21-002","price":1350.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-21-002.png?v=1788398437"},{"product_id":"organizational-resilience-management-system-iso-22301-iso-31000-iso-iec-27001-iso-22316","title":"Organizational Resilience Management System (ISO 22301, ISO 31000, ISO\/IEC 27001, ISO 22316)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAn integrated organizational resilience management system built on ISO 22301, ISO 31000, ISO\/IEC 27001 and ISO 22316 — one documented framework covering continuity, risk, information security and resilience maturity.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOrganizational resilience is not a single discipline. Business continuity (ISO 22301:2019) and information security (ISO\/IEC 27001:2022) are certifiable management systems; enterprise risk management (ISO 31000:2018) and organizational resilience principles (ISO 22316:2017) are the guidance standards that give those systems their method and their maturity. Most organisations document them separately, and end up with four overlapping sets of policies, registers and audits.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis toolkit documents them as one system. A single Level 1 manual — with the Organizational Resilience Policy and a clause cross-reference matrix built in — sits above a common set of procedures, records and audit tools, so context analysis, risk assessment, objectives, competence, internal audit and management review are done once and serve all four standards. A Standards Integration Matrix maps every document to the clauses it satisfies, giving auditors a direct line from requirement to evidence.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation follows the full operating cycle of a resilience programme: establishing scope, context and interested parties; running enterprise risk management to the ISO 31000 method; conducting business impact analysis and continuity risk assessment; selecting continuity strategies and writing the plans; responding to incidents and managing crises; and closing the loop through exercising, performance monitoring, internal audit, management review and corrective action. Information security risk management and Annex A controls are handled within the same cycle, through to a Statement of Applicability.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProcedures spanning document control, BIA, continuity planning, incident response and crisis management, information security controls, supplier resilience, exercising and audit\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWorking records and templates — risk register, BIA workbook, business continuity and IT disaster recovery plan templates, Statement of Applicability, KPI tracker\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInternal audit checklists for each standard, plus BCP activation and certification readiness checks\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuidance including an implementation roadmap (nine to twelve months to certification), a risk methodology guide and a resilience maturity model\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTraining and awareness materials with an exercise scenario library\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA master index and user guide explains the sequence: start with the manual, implement to the roadmap, localise the bracketed fields, and log every issued document in the Master Document List.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBusiness continuity managers and resilience leads building a certifiable ISO 22301 system without divorcing it from security and risk; CISOs and information security managers who need continuity and ISO\/IEC 27001 evidence to share one risk method; risk managers formalising an ISO 31000 framework; and consultants who implement integrated management systems for clients. It suits organisations pursuing ISO 22301 or ISO\/IEC 27001 certification — or both — as well as those using ISO 22316 to benchmark and mature their resilience programme before committing to audit.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017076285780,"sku":"AGS-21-003","price":750.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-21-003.png?v=1788398443"},{"product_id":"ai-governance-responsible-management-system-aigms","title":"AI Governance \u0026 Responsible Management System (AIGMS)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented AI governance and responsible AI management system built around ISO\/IEC 42001:2023 — from the governance charter and risk taxonomy through to a defensible AI Statement of Applicability.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAI governance is no longer a single-standard exercise. ISO\/IEC 42001:2023 defines what an AI management system must be; ISO\/IEC 23894:2023 sets the discipline of AI risk management; ISO\/IEC 42005 establishes AI system impact assessment as a subject in its own right; ISO\/IEC 38507:2022 separates the governing body's duties from management's; the NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 and its 2024 Generative AI Profile supply the operating vocabulary regulators increasingly borrow; and Regulation (EU) 2024\/1689 — the EU AI Act — turns much of that practice into enforceable duty for providers and deployers. Most organisations now answer to several of these at once, usually before anyone has formally been given the job.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe AGS AI Governance \u0026amp; Responsible AI Management System (AIGMS) is our flagship response: one internally consistent documentation stack covering that whole landscape. It is built around ISO\/IEC 42001:2023 as the principal management-system reference and cross-referenced, document by document and control by control, to ISO\/IEC 23894:2023, ISO\/IEC 42005, ISO\/IEC 38507:2022, ISO\/IEC 22989:2022, the NIST AI RMF and Generative AI Profile, the OECD AI Principles, the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, the EU AI Act and ISO\/IEC 27001:2022. Every mapping sits in a thirteen-column framework crosswalk, and every source carries a stated verification status in the reference matrix — so the alignment is traceable, not merely asserted.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe AIGMS documents the complete management cycle — establish, operate, audit, improve — in five working layers:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eGovern\u003c\/strong\u003e — the AI Governance Manual, a governance charter and a policy layer running from acceptable use and procurement to generative AI, transparency and human oversight.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eOperate\u003c\/strong\u003e — procedures with matched forms for every recurring decision: use-case approval, classification, risk and impact assessment, vendor due diligence, model change, agent authorisation and retirement.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eRecord\u003c\/strong\u003e — a fifteen-register workbook (AI systems, use cases, risks, incidents, vendors, obligations, evidence and more), sixteen audit checklists and a KPI catalogue.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eAssure\u003c\/strong\u003e — a control library of 163 AGS-authored controls, internal audit and management review packs, and an AI Statement of Applicability.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEmbed\u003c\/strong\u003e — role-based training modules, an implementation roadmap and topic indexes that gather every artefact by discipline.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCoverage extends to the questions that arrive after the policies are written: generative AI use and risk, workforce tool approval, AI agent authorisation, shadow-AI discovery, model cards, fairness testing, human rights and sustainability impact, business continuity and fallback, and complaint handling with human review. Every document uses consistent square-bracket placeholders, follows a single numbering scheme and is listed in a master document register; the risk method rests on a 76-item AI risk taxonomy, and an evidence pack index ties each record back to the claim it supports.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe daily user is whoever holds the AI governance officer role, formally appointed or not yet. Around that role, the manual, policies and KPI catalogue serve executives and the governance committee; the assessment forms serve AI system owners; the checklists and control library serve internal auditors; and the obligation register and regulatory change procedure serve legal and compliance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe system is sector-neutral and scales from an organisation whose entire AI footprint is a handful of SaaS tools — the most common case, and the one most often ungoverned — to a group building and deploying its own models. AGS also publishes a policy-layer AI governance package and a single-standard ISO\/IEC 42001 toolkit, and both remain the right choice where the need is narrower. The AIGMS sits above them: the full-stack system for organisations that want the entire discipline — governance, risk, assurance and training — from one coherent source.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017077301588,"sku":"AGS-21-004","price":1550.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-21-004.png?v=1788398444"}],"url":"https:\/\/agskits.com\/collections\/information-security-risk-business-continuity.oembed?page=3","provider":"Apex Global Solutions","version":"1.0","type":"link"}