{"title":"New \u0026amp; recently added","description":"\u003cp\u003eThe most recently published AGS toolkits.\u003c\/p\u003e","products":[{"product_id":"integrated-organizational-resilience-management-system-kit-iorms","title":"Integrated Organizational Resilience Management System Kit (IORMS)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented organizational resilience management system that treats business continuity as one capability among sixteen — from governance and business impact analysis through crisis, cyber and supply chain resilience to exercising, audit and management review.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOrganizational resilience asks a harder question than business continuity alone: not \"can we restore this process?\" but \"can the whole chain beneath each critical service stay within the harm your customers and regulators will tolerate?\" The IORMS kit documents a single, integrated management system built for that question. Its architecture follows the clause structure of ISO 22301:2019 (including Amendment 1:2024) with the guidance of ISO 22313:2020; the business impact analysis subsystem is designed to ISO\/TS 22317:2021; incident management draws on ISO 22320; risk management is anchored to ISO 31000:2018; and the cyber and technology layer uses the taxonomy of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (2024).\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEvery document is original, editable material — nothing here reproduces standard text. The value is in the connections: a business impact analysis that sizes a strategy, that becomes a plan, that is exercised, that produces a finding, that becomes a tracked corrective action, that reaches management review. A framework crosswalk maps the whole system to ISO 22301 clause numbers, NIST CSF 2.0 Functions and DORA articles, and a controlled reference matrix records exactly which edition of every source the kit was built against — so alignment claims can be evidenced rather than asserted.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe system is organized as sixteen capability layers under one governance spine: a management manual, a governance charter with committee terms of reference and a RACI, and a policy set spanning every layer from enterprise risk to competence and awareness. Beneath that spine sit the working subsystems:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalysis — risk method and scoring, resilience strategy and maturity assessment, and a full BIA subsystem with methodology, interview and workshop guide, questionnaire and scoring workbook;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePlanning and response — business continuity, crisis management, incident, recovery and emergency preparedness, each with procedures and plan templates;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOperational resilience — critical service identification and mapping, impact tolerance setting, and live service registers and assessment workbooks;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExtended enterprise — supplier criticality and resilience assessment, monitoring and exit, and third-party resilience governance;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCyber and technology — cyber resilience assessment, technology recovery planning and backup-and-restore verification;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAssurance — an exercise programme with scenario library, a KPI dashboard, internal audit, management review, and nonconformity and lessons-learned procedures.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA phased implementation roadmap with go\/no-go gates, a role-based training programme, and a worked end-to-end example that reconciles to the shipped workbooks show you how the layers connect in practice. An optional DORA sector module maps the system to Regulation (EU) 2022\/2554 for in-scope financial entities — ICT risk framework mapping, incident classification and reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk and a register of information template.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHeads of business continuity and resilience stepping up from standalone BCM to an integrated resilience remit; chief risk and operations officers who want continuity, crisis, cyber and supplier resilience run as one system rather than four; and operational resilience and ICT risk leads in financial services preparing for DORA. It suits mid-size to large organizations building a resilience function on a defensible, auditable baseline, and consultancies delivering resilience programmes to a consistent, evidenced method.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017076121940,"sku":"AGS-21-002","price":1350.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-21-002.png?v=1788398437"},{"product_id":"organizational-resilience-management-system-iso-22301-iso-31000-iso-iec-27001-iso-22316","title":"Organizational Resilience Management System (ISO 22301, ISO 31000, ISO\/IEC 27001, ISO 22316)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAn integrated organizational resilience management system built on ISO 22301, ISO 31000, ISO\/IEC 27001 and ISO 22316 — one documented framework covering continuity, risk, information security and resilience maturity.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOrganizational resilience is not a single discipline. Business continuity (ISO 22301:2019) and information security (ISO\/IEC 27001:2022) are certifiable management systems; enterprise risk management (ISO 31000:2018) and organizational resilience principles (ISO 22316:2017) are the guidance standards that give those systems their method and their maturity. Most organisations document them separately, and end up with four overlapping sets of policies, registers and audits.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis toolkit documents them as one system. A single Level 1 manual — with the Organizational Resilience Policy and a clause cross-reference matrix built in — sits above a common set of procedures, records and audit tools, so context analysis, risk assessment, objectives, competence, internal audit and management review are done once and serve all four standards. A Standards Integration Matrix maps every document to the clauses it satisfies, giving auditors a direct line from requirement to evidence.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation follows the full operating cycle of a resilience programme: establishing scope, context and interested parties; running enterprise risk management to the ISO 31000 method; conducting business impact analysis and continuity risk assessment; selecting continuity strategies and writing the plans; responding to incidents and managing crises; and closing the loop through exercising, performance monitoring, internal audit, management review and corrective action. Information security risk management and Annex A controls are handled within the same cycle, through to a Statement of Applicability.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProcedures spanning document control, BIA, continuity planning, incident response and crisis management, information security controls, supplier resilience, exercising and audit\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWorking records and templates — risk register, BIA workbook, business continuity and IT disaster recovery plan templates, Statement of Applicability, KPI tracker\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInternal audit checklists for each standard, plus BCP activation and certification readiness checks\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuidance including an implementation roadmap (nine to twelve months to certification), a risk methodology guide and a resilience maturity model\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTraining and awareness materials with an exercise scenario library\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA master index and user guide explains the sequence: start with the manual, implement to the roadmap, localise the bracketed fields, and log every issued document in the Master Document List.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBusiness continuity managers and resilience leads building a certifiable ISO 22301 system without divorcing it from security and risk; CISOs and information security managers who need continuity and ISO\/IEC 27001 evidence to share one risk method; risk managers formalising an ISO 31000 framework; and consultants who implement integrated management systems for clients. It suits organisations pursuing ISO 22301 or ISO\/IEC 27001 certification — or both — as well as those using ISO 22316 to benchmark and mature their resilience programme before committing to audit.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017076285780,"sku":"AGS-21-003","price":750.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-21-003.png?v=1788398443"},{"product_id":"ai-governance-responsible-management-system-aigms","title":"AI Governance \u0026 Responsible Management System (AIGMS)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented AI governance and responsible AI management system built around ISO\/IEC 42001:2023 — from the governance charter and risk taxonomy through to a defensible AI Statement of Applicability.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAI governance is no longer a single-standard exercise. ISO\/IEC 42001:2023 defines what an AI management system must be; ISO\/IEC 23894:2023 sets the discipline of AI risk management; ISO\/IEC 42005 establishes AI system impact assessment as a subject in its own right; ISO\/IEC 38507:2022 separates the governing body's duties from management's; the NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 and its 2024 Generative AI Profile supply the operating vocabulary regulators increasingly borrow; and Regulation (EU) 2024\/1689 — the EU AI Act — turns much of that practice into enforceable duty for providers and deployers. Most organisations now answer to several of these at once, usually before anyone has formally been given the job.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe AGS AI Governance \u0026amp; Responsible AI Management System (AIGMS) is our flagship response: one internally consistent documentation stack covering that whole landscape. It is built around ISO\/IEC 42001:2023 as the principal management-system reference and cross-referenced, document by document and control by control, to ISO\/IEC 23894:2023, ISO\/IEC 42005, ISO\/IEC 38507:2022, ISO\/IEC 22989:2022, the NIST AI RMF and Generative AI Profile, the OECD AI Principles, the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, the EU AI Act and ISO\/IEC 27001:2022. Every mapping sits in a thirteen-column framework crosswalk, and every source carries a stated verification status in the reference matrix — so the alignment is traceable, not merely asserted.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe AIGMS documents the complete management cycle — establish, operate, audit, improve — in five working layers:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eGovern\u003c\/strong\u003e — the AI Governance Manual, a governance charter and a policy layer running from acceptable use and procurement to generative AI, transparency and human oversight.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eOperate\u003c\/strong\u003e — procedures with matched forms for every recurring decision: use-case approval, classification, risk and impact assessment, vendor due diligence, model change, agent authorisation and retirement.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eRecord\u003c\/strong\u003e — a fifteen-register workbook (AI systems, use cases, risks, incidents, vendors, obligations, evidence and more), sixteen audit checklists and a KPI catalogue.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eAssure\u003c\/strong\u003e — a control library of 163 AGS-authored controls, internal audit and management review packs, and an AI Statement of Applicability.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEmbed\u003c\/strong\u003e — role-based training modules, an implementation roadmap and topic indexes that gather every artefact by discipline.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCoverage extends to the questions that arrive after the policies are written: generative AI use and risk, workforce tool approval, AI agent authorisation, shadow-AI discovery, model cards, fairness testing, human rights and sustainability impact, business continuity and fallback, and complaint handling with human review. Every document uses consistent square-bracket placeholders, follows a single numbering scheme and is listed in a master document register; the risk method rests on a 76-item AI risk taxonomy, and an evidence pack index ties each record back to the claim it supports.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe daily user is whoever holds the AI governance officer role, formally appointed or not yet. Around that role, the manual, policies and KPI catalogue serve executives and the governance committee; the assessment forms serve AI system owners; the checklists and control library serve internal auditors; and the obligation register and regulatory change procedure serve legal and compliance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe system is sector-neutral and scales from an organisation whose entire AI footprint is a handful of SaaS tools — the most common case, and the one most often ungoverned — to a group building and deploying its own models. AGS also publishes a policy-layer AI governance package and a single-standard ISO\/IEC 42001 toolkit, and both remain the right choice where the need is narrower. The AIGMS sits above them: the full-stack system for organisations that want the entire discipline — governance, risk, assurance and training — from one coherent source.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017077301588,"sku":"AGS-21-004","price":1550.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-21-004.png?v=1788398444"},{"product_id":"gem-2-1-uae-government-excellence-model-documentation-kit","title":"GEM 2.1 UAE Government Excellence Model Documentation Kit","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA complete readiness and self-assessment documentation system prepared for the UAE Government Excellence Model (GEM 2.1) — from first baseline through mock assessment to a signed readiness decision.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe UAE Government Excellence Model, version 2.1, is the framework under which federal and local government entities are assessed through the Sheikh Khalifa Government Excellence Program. It is organised around three pillars — vision realisation, distinctive value and enablers — spanning eleven criteria, from Enhancing Wellbeing and Future Readiness through New Generation Services and Intelligent Enablement to Partnerships and Government Communication, and assessed through the lenses of capabilities, results and catalysts. Preparing well is less about understanding the model than about producing the working record: honest self-ratings, retrievable evidence, defensible results, and a leadership team that knows its gaps before an assessor finds them.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis kit is an independent AGS documentation product prepared for exactly that work. It references the official model's structure by name and originates everything else: the assessment scales, evidence controls, KPI disciplines, question banks and readiness tests are AGS constructs, labelled as such throughout, with a term-level provenance register documenting the distinction and a candid record of the kit's version basis and source caveats in its reference module. It is not an official publication of the UAE Government or the Sheikh Khalifa Government Excellence Program and confers no certification, accreditation or official status.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe kit is built as a sixteen-module working sequence that mirrors a full twelve-week preparation cycle. It opens with master guides for every role — implementer, assessor, leader, employee — then baselines the entity, runs the self-assessment through linked workbooks built beneath the model's three lenses, and registers evidence under ownership, expiry and completeness controls. Each of the eleven criteria has its own working package of guidance, assessment, gap analysis and improvement planning, with a dedicated innovation and transformation module alongside.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSelf-assessment workbooks consolidating into a calibrated master rating with built-in honesty checks\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn evidence system: master register, retrieval index, ownership matrix and coverage mapping\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKPI registers enforcing mandatory fields, benchmark verdicts and reproducible headline numbers\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA gap-and-improvement engine with prioritisation, quick wins and a verification gate before closure\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA mock assessment programme with interview preparation, site-visit checklists and an original assessor question bank\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGovernance instruments and a final readiness pack computing a Ready \/ Ready-with-reservations \/ Not-ready recommendation for the Sponsor's signature\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEvery instrument connects to a master traceability spine: gaps, evidence items, KPIs and decisions flow through named registers rather than sitting as orphan templates, and nothing closes without verification.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFederal and local UAE government entities preparing for excellence assessment, and the excellence, strategy and institutional development teams who run that preparation. It suits heads of excellence offices who need working instruments rather than another framework explanation, leadership teams who want an honest readiness answer before an external assessor supplies one, and advisors supporting government clients through a structured preparation cycle. Everything is native, editable Word and Excel with no macros or software dependency, so the entity owns and adapts the system itself.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017077367124,"sku":"AGS-22-001","price":1450.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-22-001.png?v=1788398448"},{"product_id":"mbrgea-excellence-readiness-kit","title":"MBRGEA Excellence Readiness Kit","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA complete award-readiness documentation system for government entities preparing with reference to the Mohammed Bin Rashid Government Excellence Award, built on the current GEM 2.1 framework.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Mohammed Bin Rashid Government Excellence Award assesses UAE government entities against the Government Excellence Model. The current edition, GEM 2.1, is not a checklist: it is an ecosystem of ten Fundamentals of Excellence, three cross-cutting catalysts — innovation, preemptiveness and agility — and eleven weighted criteria arranged across three pillars: Vision Realisation, Distinctive Value and Enablers. Preparing well is therefore an organisation-wide programme — an honest self-assessment, evidence that can be retrieved on demand, gaps closed and verified, and leaders and employees who can speak to the entity's real position without a script.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis kit documents that programme end to end. Every tool maps to the GEM 2.1 criterion structure — the framework analysis derives from the Government Excellence Model Manual, GEM 2.1 (Volume 3), with the Prime Minister's Medals Criteria Guide (3rd Edition, 2026) governing the individual-recognition materials — and the reference base is itself set out in an included validation report, so you can audit the foundation before you rely on it. AGS is an independent commercial provider: the kit supports internal readiness and self-assessment work alongside the official framework documents, and is not issued, endorsed or approved by the award authorities or any government body.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe kit runs an eleven-stage readiness journey, each stage with named inputs, named outputs and a decision gate — from a framework baseline signed by the executive sponsor through to a final readiness report with residual risk accepted in writing. Across that journey it covers:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBaseline readiness, maturity and eligibility assessment, with a preparation roadmap\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA master self-assessment workbook, facilitation and consensus-workshop materials, and dedicated catalyst and Fundamentals worksheets\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvidence registers with mapping, ownership, quality tests and retrieval drills\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKPI, results, benchmarking and impact registers across all three pillars\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCriterion toolkits spanning strategy and governance, customer and service excellence, people and capability, innovation and future readiness, partnerships and communication, and excellence initiatives\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConsolidated gap analysis and verified closure, a full internal mock assessment, leadership and employee interview preparation, and a final signed readiness position\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscipline is built in: one master evidence register, one improvement action plan and one controlled input workbook feeding the executive dashboard, so figures cannot diverge between documents — with a master traceability matrix showing how every file connects to the eleven criteria and to each stage of the sequence.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBuilt for the teams who carry award preparation inside a government entity: executive sponsors at director-general or undersecretary level, programme leads and heads of excellence or institutional development, excellence and quality offices, and the criterion owners drawn from operating departments. It suits federal and local entities preparing for a first cycle as much as experienced entities that want a tighter, evidence-led programme — and the advisory teams supporting them.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017077530964,"sku":"AGS-22-002","price":1250.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-22-002.png?v=1788398451"},{"product_id":"corporate-excellence-awards-readiness-system","title":"Corporate Excellence Awards Readiness System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented corporate excellence and awards readiness management system — from excellence policy and governed self-assessment through to submission, mock assessment and site-visit day.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExcellence awards are won long before the submission deadline. Whether the target is an EFQM-based recognition, a government excellence programme or a sector quality, innovation or sustainability award, assessors reward the same things: a governed excellence framework, self-assessment that produces evidence rather than opinion, results the organisation can verify, and leaders who can stand in front of an assessor panel and explain both. This system documents that machinery end to end, so award readiness becomes a managed annual cycle rather than a pre-deadline scramble.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIt is deliberately framework-neutral. Every requirement in the system carries an AGS Source Classification Code (A–F) that separates official award requirements from recommended practice, and the Excellence Framework Mapping Matrix arrives structurally complete with pre-structured rows — EFQM, government excellence programmes, and corporate, quality, innovation and sustainability awards — each held at \"source verification required\" until it is verified against the awarding body's own published criteria for the applicable cycle. Nothing is reconstructed from memory or a consultant's summary, so what you present to an assessor is defensible by construction.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation is organised as a 38-module architecture under a single apex document. The Corporate Excellence Management Manual, the Corporate Excellence Policy and an excellence governance procedure establish ownership through an Excellence Office and Steering Committee. Eleven domain-level procedures, issued as one controlled compendium, govern criteria management, strategic, customer, people, operational, digital and sustainability excellence, organisational results, benchmarking, innovation and best practice. A twelve-sheet Excel self-assessment tool then takes the organisation from profile and criteria through evidence, scoring, gap analysis and action planning to a management dashboard, alongside maturity assessment and internal assessment routes.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe award cycle itself is documented stage by stage:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eaward readiness assessment and the go\/no-go decision;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003esubmission management, with a master submission template and an excellence story development guide;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003emock assessment, run from a question bank with preparation mapped by role;\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003esite-visit readiness and interview preparation for leaders and process owners.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEvidence and results run underneath the whole cycle: an evidence register, a KPI register with a KPI library, fifteen linked master registers (from criteria and gaps to submissions, assessors and site-visit actions), topic checklists spanning governance through to site-visit day, assessment and executive dashboard report templates, a training programme, improvement and management review procedures, document control, and an implementation roadmap for standing the system up.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExcellence managers and excellence office teams preparing an organisation's first serious award entry, or professionalising a programme that has so far run on heroics; strategy and performance directors in government entities entering national and government excellence programmes; quality and business excellence leads in private-sector organisations pursuing corporate, quality, innovation or sustainability awards; and advisers who build and operate award readiness programmes for clients. It suits organisations that want the excellence system to outlast the award cycle — a permanent management discipline, not a one-off submission project.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017077858644,"sku":"AGS-22-003","price":850.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-22-003.png?v=1788398455"},{"product_id":"uae-ai-award-excellence-kit-2026","title":"UAE AI Award Excellence Kit 2026","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA complete preparation system for the UAE Artificial Intelligence Award 2026, from the two pass\/fail entry gates through to a quality-assured submission master file.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe UAE Artificial Intelligence Award 2026 — the Third Edition of the award — recognises exceptional AI adoption across five categories: AI Service Excellence, UAE-Developed Agentic AI, Government–Private Partnership, AI Leader and AI Research. Entry is governed by two hard gates set out in the official Award Guide: six eligibility criteria assessed pass\/fail, and a five-question agentic AI self-assessment that must be answered Yes on every question. Nominations that clear the gates are then evaluated on the official 1–4 scoring scale, with a mandatory AI ethics self-assessment forming part of the submission.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis kit converts the publicly available UAE Artificial Intelligence Award 2026 Guide (Third Edition) into a working preparation methodology. Every requirement is explicitly tagged — official award requirement, AGS recommended practice, or illustrative example — with the provenance of each source recorded in a dedicated Source and Reference Register. Nothing here is software: every artefact is an editable Word document, a calculating Excel workbook, or a controlled PDF reference version.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation follows a ten-phase journey from first eligibility check to final submission:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe two entry gates — eligibility and agentic AI — each with its own form, evidence register, calculating workbook and assessment report\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCategory selection through a weighted decision matrix, followed by a fourteen-dimension award readiness assessment with scorecard and heatmap\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTechnical substance: AI solution architecture, data and integration, process transformation and project documentation packs\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvidence management, KPI and impact measurement workbooks, responsible AI and ethics, and cybersecurity and compliance\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSelf-scoring against the official 1–4 scale, a requirement-to-evidence traceability matrix and a gap register\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFinal submission QA, closed out with an internal readiness certificate and executive report\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThree submission master file models carry the narrative itself — Model A for the project-based categories, Model B for AI Leader and Model C for AI Research — supported by a tailored package for each of the five award categories and a structured video submission kit. A guidance manual, illustrative examples pack, templates catalogue and full document control layer sit underneath the working documents.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGovernment entities and departments preparing nominations; UAE-based developers of agentic AI solutions; Chief AI Officers, digital transformation leads and corporate strategy or excellence teams; research institutions targeting the AI Research category; and advisory firms preparing award submissions on behalf of clients. It suits both first-time entrants who need the full pathway and experienced teams who want a disciplined evidence and QA layer over an existing submission.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAGS is an independent publisher. This kit is a preparation resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by the UAE Government, the AI Office, or any award body, and does not guarantee any award outcome.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017077924180,"sku":"AGS-22-004","price":1450.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-22-004.png?v=1788398459"},{"product_id":"integrated-healthcare-quality-safety-risk-management-system-iso-7101-iso-9001-iso-31000","title":"Integrated Healthcare Quality, Safety \u0026 Risk Management System (ISO 7101, ISO 9001, ISO 31000)","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented healthcare quality, safety and risk management system that integrates ISO 7101:2023, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 31000:2018 into one controlled set of documents — from the integrated management system manual down to the surgical safety checklist.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 7101:2023 is the first certifiable international management system standard written specifically for quality in healthcare organisations. It asks for things a generic quality standard does not: patient safety incident reporting and learning, infection prevention and control, medication safety, informed consent and patient rights, and demonstrable clinical improvement. At the same time, most providers already run — or are expected to run — an ISO 9001:2015 quality management system, and accreditors increasingly expect risk management structured on ISO 31000:2018.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis toolkit resolves that overlap by integration rather than duplication. A single manual, one document-control regime, one risk method and one audit programme satisfy all three standards together. The Standards Integration Guide explains how the pieces interlock — ISO 9001 supplying the management system spine, ISO 7101 the healthcare-specific requirements, ISO 31000 the risk framework beneath both — and clause-by-clause checklists for each standard let you evidence conformity separately when auditors ask.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation runs the full arc from board-level governance to the point of care. An Integrated Management System Manual and master reading guide sit at the top; beneath them, the procedures cover both the system disciplines — control of documented information, internal audit, management review, nonconformity and CAPA, management of change — and the clinical operations that ISO 7101:2023 actually examines: care planning and service delivery, infection prevention and control, medication management, patient safety incident reporting, patient experience and complaints, informed consent, and emergency preparedness with business continuity. Every procedure is fed by matching working documents, and the guidance layer sequences the whole build.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eForms and registers, from the risk register and CAPA log to the medication error report, competence matrix and patient satisfaction survey\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eClause-by-clause compliance checklists for ISO 7101:2023, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 31000:2018, plus clinical audits — hand hygiene, health-record documentation, surgical safety, facility safety rounds — and a certification readiness checklist\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA 12-month implementation roadmap, risk matrix definitions and a documentation style guide\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTraining modules spanning all-staff awareness, risk management, incident reporting and new-staff induction\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEach document carries a controlled header, revision history and approval block, and every item is registered on the Document Master List so the system is audit-traceable from day one.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHospitals, clinics, day-surgery centres, diagnostic services and long-term care providers pursuing ISO 7101:2023 certification — whether building a management system from nothing or extending an existing ISO 9001:2015 certificate into healthcare-specific territory. It is written for quality and patient safety directors, clinical governance leads, risk managers and hospital administrators, and for the consultants who implement integrated management systems on their behalf.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017077989716,"sku":"AGS-23-001","price":1250.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-23-001.png?v=1788398463"},{"product_id":"nutrition-consultancy-operations-system","title":"Nutrition Consultancy Operations System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA complete operating system for a nutrition consulting firm — from lead qualification and client acceptance through delivery, independent technical review and defensible release of every engagement.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA nutrition consultancy sells qualified professional judgment, and that creates a governance problem generic quality systems never address: how to run a commercial firm — pipeline, proposals, contracts, invoicing — without commercial pressure ever touching a professional finding. This system documents a firm built around that separation. Its governing manual follows the requirements architecture of ISO 7101:2023 (healthcare quality management), with operating principles drawn from the ICDA International Competency Standards and Code of Ethics, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Nutrition Care Process, ESPEN and A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidance, the GLIM consensus malnutrition criteria and the HCPC Standards of Proficiency for Dietitians — each source traced to specific procedures, forms and evidence in a dedicated Standards Reference \u0026amp; Traceability Matrix.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe engagement lifecycle runs through eight recorded quality gates, from bid\/no-bid decision to closure. Two can never be waived: no deliverable leaves the firm without independent technical review, and none is released without a formal approval the producer cannot sign alone. Standing boundary rules keep activities reserved by law with registered professionals, and refer enteral and parenteral nutrition decisions to the client's own clinical governance rather than deciding them at the consultancy layer.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation is arranged in six folders that mirror how a consultancy actually operates. The governing layer — manuals, policies, controlled job descriptions for the nine operating roles, and the KPI, standards and integration matrices — defines what must be true. The procedures define how each process is done, the forms and registers capture the evidence it was done, and the checklists, plain-language how-to guides and training modules carry the system into daily practice. Together they run the full lifecycle:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBusiness development, lead qualification, bid\/no-bid decisions, proposals, pricing and contract control\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProject planning, delivery control, evidence logging, professional judgment and recommendation development\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTechnical review, approval to release, report production and deliverable traceability\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConsultant credentialing, authorisation, CPD, performance and subcontractor control\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRisk, internal audit, management review, complaints, incidents, KPIs, invoicing and project profitability\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEvery document carries controlled headers, ownership and version history. A customisation and localisation manual governs tailoring to your organisation, and a quick-start guide sequences implementation in ten steps. Where an engagement touches individual patient care, a documented practice interface routes the clinical work to the appropriate professional governance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBuilt for founders and managing directors of nutrition consulting firms, dietitian-led practices growing from solo work into a multi-consultant business, and technical or clinical directors who must guarantee independence of judgment while the firm sells. It serves corporate and workplace nutrition providers, school and institutional nutrition advisers, food and product nutrition advisory practices and nutrition training providers — and gives quality managers one framework for gates, audits and management review across all of them. It suits equally a firm formalising its operations to qualify for tenders and contracts that demand documented quality management.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017078088020,"sku":"AGS-23-002","price":1150.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-23-002.png?v=1788398466"},{"product_id":"professional-dietitian-practice-toolkit","title":"Professional Dietitian Practice Toolkit","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA complete documented practice system for the professional dietitian — from first client contact, through the Nutrition Care Process, to competency review and professional self-audit.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA practising dietitian is judged on two things: the quality of the care decision and the quality of the record behind it. This toolkit documents both. Its clinical core follows the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' four-step Nutrition Care Process — assessment, diagnosis with PES statement construction, intervention, and monitoring and evaluation — and extends it into everything that surrounds the care cycle: intake and informed consent, nutrition screening with validated instruments, malnutrition identification under the GLIM framework, counselling and behaviour change, diet and meal planning, telehealth and progress notes, referral and escalation, and episode closure.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAround that core sits a professional governance layer traceable to named sources: the ICDA International Competency Standards for Dietitian-Nutritionists and Code of Ethics, the HCPC Standards of Proficiency for Dietitians, ESPEN and A.S.P.E.N. clinical guideline logic, WHO\/FAO healthy diet principles, Codex Alimentarius nutrition labelling, and the quality principles of ISO 7101:2023 adapted to an individual practitioner. A standards reference and traceability matrix records which document implements which source — so when a registration body, employer or purchaser asks \"on what basis?\", the answer is one lookup.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe toolkit is organised as a client journey, with every form filed at its point of use: the intake form beside the intake guide, the GLIM assessment record beside the guide that teaches it and the checklist that verifies it. A master index and navigation map hold the whole system together, and a customisation register tracks how you adapt it to your jurisdiction and setting.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStep-by-step method guides for each stage of the Nutrition Care Process and the professional duties around it\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eForms and records covering the full episode of care, from initial intake to discharge summary\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConsultation, documentation and practice checklists that verify each stage\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA self-paced training curriculum with a knowledge-check item bank and competency observation tool\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompetency, CPD and reflective-practice systems, plus a multi-domain professional self-audit and PDSA-based quality improvement\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA reference library with source register, traceability matrix and glossary\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDietitians and nutritionists in private practice whose records must stand on their own; clinical dietitians in hospitals, clinics and community settings working to the Nutrition Care Process; newly qualified practitioners building a defensible practice system from the first client; and telehealth practitioners who need consent, contact notes and escalation routes in writing. It also suits practice owners standardising the way several practitioners work, and any dietitian preparing for a registration, credentialing or employer review. Every document carries control fields and a jurisdiction entry completed before use, so the system adapts to the regulator you answer to.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017078251860,"sku":"AGS-23-003","price":850.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-23-003.png?v=1788398473"},{"product_id":"professional-nutrition-dietetics-management-system","title":"Professional Nutrition \u0026 Dietetics Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented professional practice, clinical workflow and quality management system for nutrition and dietetics services — from validated screening through GLIM malnutrition diagnosis to internal audit and management review.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClinical nutrition now carries the full weight of a regulated discipline. Malnutrition is expected to be diagnosed against the GLIM (2019) consensus criteria, care is expected to follow the Academy's Nutrition Care Process, and the service itself is increasingly expected to run as a managed system in the spirit of ISO 7101:2023, the healthcare quality management standard. Most dietetics departments practise well but document unevenly — screening tools with no controlling policy, nutrition support with no escalation record, competency with no audit trail.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis system closes that gap in three layers: professional (who practises — anchored in the ICDA Competency Standards 2016, the ICDA Code of Ethics and the HCPC Standards of Proficiency 2023), clinical (how care is delivered — through the NCP, GLIM and the A.S.P.E.N. 2013 and ESPEN 2025 nutrition support guidance) and management (how the service is governed — mapped clause by clause to ISO 7101:2023). A controlled Standards Reference \u0026amp; Traceability Matrix ties every referenced principle to the policy that requires it, the procedure that implements it, the form that records it, the KPI that measures it and the checklist that audits it.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation follows the full patient journey and the full management cycle:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eNutrition Care Process\u003c\/strong\u003e — referral and intake, validated screening, comprehensive assessment (anthropometric, dietary, biochemical and nutrition-focused physical findings), PES-format diagnosis, care planning, intervention, education and counselling, monitoring, reassessment and discharge.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eMalnutrition and nutrition support\u003c\/strong\u003e — GLIM two-step diagnosis and severity grading (with the 2022 muscle-mass guidance), refeeding risk escalation, enteral and parenteral nutrition monitoring, and food–drug interaction review.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eProfessional governance\u003c\/strong\u003e — ethics, informed consent, confidentiality, scope of practice and delegation, competency assessment, CPD and performance evaluation.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eService management\u003c\/strong\u003e — document and record control, risk management, incident reporting, internal audit, KPI reporting, management review and continual improvement, aligned to ISO 7101:2023 clauses 4–10.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEducation and labelling\u003c\/strong\u003e — patient education material control, healthy diet principles per FAO\/WHO (2024), and nutrition labelling and claims review under Codex CXG 2-1985 (as amended 2024).\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGuidance documents explain the judgement calls — writing defensible PES statements, applying GLIM, selecting screening tools, muscle-mass assessment methods and their limitations — while a modular training curriculum with a trainer guide and assessment item bank turns the documentation into a departmental induction and competency programme. An implementation and customisation manual, a customisation register and a readiness checklist govern adaptation to your own care setting, and square-bracket placeholders mark every organisation-defined value.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHeads of nutrition and dietetics departments, chief clinical dietitians and quality managers in hospitals, clinics, long-term care and community nutrition services — whether formalising an established department, standing up a new service, or preparing the nutrition function for accreditation and internal audit. It equally serves consultants implementing clinical governance for dietetics teams, and training programmes that need a complete, worked example of a professional practice system.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017078284628,"sku":"AGS-23-004","price":1350.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-23-004.png?v=1788398474"},{"product_id":"iso-39001-road-traffic-safety-management-system","title":"ISO 39001 Road Traffic Safety Management System","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA documented ISO 39001:2012 road traffic safety management system, from the Safe System approach through to journey management, crash investigation and certification readiness.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eISO 39001:2012 — Road traffic safety (RTS) management systems, requirements with guidance for use — is the international standard for organisations that interact with the road traffic system: any business whose people drive for work, that moves goods or passengers by road, or whose activities generate traffic. Built on the Safe System approach, it is deliberately results-focused. Rather than prescribing controls, it asks an organisation to select the RTS performance factors it can genuinely influence — journey planning, speed, vehicle condition, driver fitness and licensing, post-crash response — and to manage them towards the elimination of death and serious injury.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis toolkit is a complete documented RTS management system written against every clause of the standard. Each document carries formal document control, authorisation blocks and its ISO 39001:2012 clause references; the manual includes a conformity matrix mapping the system to every clause, and a master index and user guide explains where each document lives and where a new user should start.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat this system covers\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe documentation is arranged in six layers that mirror how a working system is built: the manual and Road Traffic Safety Policy state what the organisation does and why; the procedures state how each process works, from context and performance factors through operational control to audit, management review and contractor control; the forms and registers become the records that prove it; the checklists verify it; the guidance notes explain it; and the training modules build the competence to run it.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOperationally, the system follows the driving task end to end:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJourney risk assessment, journey planning and safe journey management\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVehicle safety, maintenance, roadworthiness and daily pre-use inspection\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDriver licensing, medical fitness, authorisation, fatigue and behaviour observation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEmergency preparedness, post-crash response and crash investigation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerformance factor monitoring, KPI reporting, internal audit and management review\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe guidance layer carries an implementer from a clause-by-clause gap analysis at the outset to an implementation roadmap and certification readiness guide at the end, including what a certification body looks for at Stage 1 and Stage 2 and the findings that most commonly appear.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho it's for\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten for fleet, transport and logistics operators and any organisation with real driving exposure — haulage and distribution, bus and coach, field services, and construction or energy contractors whose people spend working hours on the road. The natural owners are HSE and fleet managers, transport compliance leads and RTS management representatives; consultants implementing ISO 39001 for clients will find the structure maps directly onto the standard's clauses. Because the documents follow the same management-system discipline as ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 — and include guidance on integrating with them — teams already running those systems can fold road traffic safety into what they have.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Apex Global Solutions AGS","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57017078415700,"sku":"AGS-24-001","price":850.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1052\/4996\/4372\/files\/AGS-24-001.png?v=1788398476"}],"url":"https:\/\/agskits.com\/collections\/new-arrivals.oembed","provider":"Apex Global Solutions","version":"1.0","type":"link"}